257 essays 1,087 funds measured independent · not paid by any fund or issuer we cover

Overlap · from SEC filings

SSO vs TQQQ: what actually overlaps

SSO and TQQQ: 57.17% of a dollar ends up in the same companies either way (SEC Form N-PORT, 2026-05-31), across 94 securities the two funds both hold. Every free comparison tool can list the tickers in common; this weights them, which is the part that decides whether owning both changes anything.

57.17%Overlap by weight
94Shared holdings
10.3Combined effective holdings
-17.2 vs SSO alone

The short version

Held alone, SSO behaves like 27.5 equally weighted positions and TQQQ like 19.5. Held together in equal size they behave like 10.3 — less diversified than holding SSO on its own. The two funds hold 94 of the same securities, 57.17% of a dollar by weight, so the pair buys those companies twice.

Overlap here is the sum, over securities both funds hold, of the smaller of the two weights: the share of a dollar that sits in the same company either way. Matching is on CUSIP. Figures are as of each fund's own reporting date (2026-05-31 and 2026-05-31), which do not always align.

Not 50/50, or holding a third fund alongside these two? The portfolio calculator runs this same math for any weights, across up to 12 funds.

Side by side

as filed
SSOTQQQ
Assets$8B$40B
Holdings510114
Effective holdings27.519.5
Top ten weight42.3%51.31%
Largest position15.58%18.12%
Priced at market (Level 1)82.87%50.67%
Reporting date2026-05-312026-05-31

Each fund on its own: SSO · TQQQ

Where the overlap actually is

94

The ten shared positions that account for the most of it, with what each fund holds of its own. Shared is the lesser of the two — the part that is held in common either way. Where the two columns diverge, one fund is making a larger bet on that company than the other, and holding both does not average it away.

CompanySSOTQQQShared
ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF 15.578% 18.123% 15.578%
N/A 13.139% 36.575% 13.139%
NVIDIA Corp. 5.196% 2.448% 2.448%
Apple, Inc. 4.64% 2.186% 2.186%
United States of America 2.214% 1.676% 1.676%
Microsoft Corp. 3.386% 1.595% 1.595%
Amazon.com, Inc. 2.677% 1.386% 1.386%
Micron Technology, Inc. 1.107% 1.44% 1.107%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.242% 1.056% 1.056%
Tesla, Inc. 1.241% 1.038% 1.038%

What the difference is made of

29.58% · 11.21%

29.58% of SSO sits in companies TQQQ does not hold at all, and 11.21% of TQQQ in companies SSO does not hold. The largest of each, by weight in its own fund:

Only in SSO (29.58%)
  • Eli Lilly & Co.
  • Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co.
  • Exxon Mobil Corp.
  • U.S. Treasury Bills
Only in TQQQ (11.21%)
  • United States of America
  • U.S. Treasury Bills
  • U.S. Treasury Bills
  • U.S. Treasury Bills
  • U.S. Treasury Bills

By country of issuer

2026-05-31

Where each fund's money sits by the issuer country its filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Two funds can share companies and still differ here, and a pair that looks diversified by name can be one country twice.

CountrySSOTQQQDifference
United States 98.16% 98.65% −0.49
Ireland° 1.28% 0.56% +0.72
Netherlands° 0.10% 0.36% −0.26
Canada 0.00% 0.24% −0.24
Switzerland 0.17% 0.00% +0.17
United Kingdom 0.00% 0.12% −0.12
Bermuda° 0.10% 0.00% +0.10
Curaçao° 0.08% 0.00% +0.08
Liberia° 0.07% 0.00% +0.07
Cayman Islands° 0.00% 0.07% −0.07

What each fund did last quarter

Each fund's newest filing against its previous one. A pair whose overlap is rising or falling does so because of these moves; the figures are the same ones on each fund's page and in its feed.

FundPeriodPositionsAddedDroppedTurnoverLargest increase
SSO 2026-02-28 → 2026-05-31 509 → 510 111015.6% N/A 5.23% → 13.14%
TQQQ 2026-02-28 → 2026-05-31 109 → 114 13851.1% N/A 0.51% → 36.57%

Written about this pair

2

This page is the measurement. These essays argue about what it means, with the figures as they stood when each was written.

Related comparisons

6

Other pairs involving SSO or TQQQ, ordered by how much they overlap.

PairOverlapCombined effective
SSO vs UPRO 77.13% 12.4
QLD vs TQQQ 66.47% 8.6
TQQQ vs UPRO 65.58% 7.1
QLD vs SSO 61.31% 16.8
QQQM vs TQQQ 29.03% 18
TQQQ vs VOO 27.74% 19.5

Sources and limits

Computed from SEC Form N-PORT (NPORT-P), the portfolio report every registered US fund files. Positions below 0.001% of net assets are dropped; weights are normalised to each filing's own total.

Unit investment trusts including SPY and DIA do not file N-PORT, so no overlap can be computed for them. Where a comparison is missing from this site, that is usually why rather than an oversight.

Overlap says what is held in common, not what will move together. Two funds with no shared holdings can still fall together, and the effective holding count takes no account of correlation. All 275 pairs are in the concentration dataset, and every fund's own history is on its fund page.