TAN holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 47.87% at a quoted market price (level 1), 13 issuer countries.

TAN's largest investment is First Solar Inc at 11.74% of net assets. Nextpower Inc and Enphase Energy Inc follow; the three together are 30.31%. Ten companies are 65.15% of the fund; the other 22 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, TAN behaves like 17.6 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 2.4 times more concentrated than the median. Across 27 quarterly filings TAN has held roughly steady since 2019-11-30 (18.6 then, 17.6 now). Between the 2026-02-28 and 2026-05-31 filings 2 positions were added and 0 dropped; 16.4% of the weight moved. the United States is the largest country at 61.67% of the portfolio, across 13 countries in the filing.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-11-30 and 2026-05-31, TAN went from behaving like 18.6 equally weighted positions to 17.6 — 5% fewer, while its top ten went from 61.37% to 65.15% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

Measured against every other fund on this site, from the same filings. Combined effective holdings is how the pair behaves held in equal size.

TAN's filing lists 34 positions including 22.01% of net assets in securities-lending cash collateral. Counted as filed the fund reads 11.6 effective holdings with a top ten of 80.35%; on its own investments — the figure above — it reads 17.6 with a top ten of 65.15%. The collateral is matched by a liability and is not a holding the fund chose; since 2026-09-18 every figure on this site sets it aside (methodology). Both numbers are in the data.

The 15 largest of 32 positions in TAN's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: TAN.csv.gz.

Share of TAN's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of TAN's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.36 percentage points over 81 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: TAN.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-05-31, $487m was out to 33 borrowers, 21.24% of net assets. The largest, BofA Securities, Inc., held 25.7% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 22.01% of net assets, 103.6% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter TAN has filed, with each borrower: TAN.json · all funds.

30 positions became 32: 2 added (2.1% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 16.4%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of TAN compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: HD Hyundai Energy Solutions Co., Ltd. (1.20%), Gigastorage Corp. (0.88%).

81.94% equity, 18.06% short-term investment as filed; 47.9% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of TAN (17.6). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.

• ICLN vs TAN: Clean-Energy ETFs After the Boom-Bust — What Survived and Why

  Over the trailing decade both funds compounded positively — ICLN at 9.8% and TAN at 11.1% annualized — but the last five years erased most of that story,...

  07 Aug 2026 9 min ETF Analysis