Mulden.
236 articles 4 sections last published 2026-08-31 independent · no sponsored placements

Fund index

MTUM

16 articles on this site analyse MTUM — 5 of them head-on.

Measured concentration

as of 2026-04-30
128 Holdings (nominal)
40.3 Effective holdings
3.2× Overstatement
40.41% Top 10 weight

MTUM reports 128 positions, but the weights make it behave like about 40.3 equally weighted ones. Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing — see what this measure does not tell you and the full table.

The same filing says what kind of price those positions carry: 100% of MTUM is held at a quoted market price, across 8 issuer countries . Comparisons across every fund are in the valuation table, and what a low share does and does not mean is worth reading before drawing a conclusion from it.

Every filing since 2019

27

Between 2019-10-31 and 2026-04-30, MTUM went from behaving like 43.4 equally weighted positions to 40.3 — 7% fewer, while its top ten went from 39.11% to 40.41% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

PeriodHoldingsEffective Top 10Largest
2026-04-30 128 40.3 40.41% 5.56%
2026-01-31 128 41.9 39.08% 5.09%
2025-10-31 128 39 43.11% 5.77%
2025-07-31 128 38.2 43.97% 6.03%
2025-04-30 126 43.7 40.37% 5.19%
2025-01-31 128 46.3 36.83% 6.1%
2024-10-31 126 44.7 39.57% 5.14%
2024-07-31 127 38.5 42.95% 6.72%
2024-04-30 126 38.7 42.91% 6.61%
2024-01-31 126 39.7 42.93% 5.64%
2023-10-31 125 39.5 42.09% 6.43%
2023-07-31 128 41.3 40.41% 6.86%
2023-04-30 128 45.1 38.63% 5.72%
2023-01-31 128 47.8 36.99% 5.32%
2022-10-31 126 39.3 43.02% 5.74%
2022-07-31 127 39.4 43.18% 5.73%
2022-04-30 123 45.8 37.49% 5.24%
2022-01-31 125 45.7 37.03% 5.16%
2021-10-31 128 41.2 39.59% 8.38%
2021-07-31 128 46.3 38.11% 5.63%
2021-04-30 127 40.5 41.49% 6.29%
2021-01-31 128 39.2 41.39% 7.38%
2020-10-31 127 39 42.18% 6.12%
2020-07-31 128 42.1 40.36% 5.93%
2020-04-30 127 41.2 41.12% 5.5%
2020-01-31 128 47.2 37.67% 5.37%
2019-10-31 127 43.4 39.11% 5.57%

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

Most often compared against

4
QUAL · 3 VOO · 2 SIZE · 1 AMOM · 1

Measures applied to it

8

All articles

16

Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.