Mulden.
257 essays 1,087 funds measured independent · not paid by any fund or issuer we cover

Fund · QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF · measured from SEC filings

AMOM holdings

AMOM reports 51 holdings and behaves like 38.5 equally weighted ones, computed from its SEC Form N-PORT filing for 2026-07-31. The fact sheet publishes the first number; this page computes the second, and traces it across 25 quarters of filings.

Measured concentration

as of 2026-07-31
51 Positions reported
38.5 Effective holdings
1.3× Concentration multiple
37.49% Top ten weight

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table . Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), 3 issuer countries.

What stands out

as of 2026-07-31

Ten companies are 37.49% of the fund; the other 41 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, AMOM behaves like 38.5 holdings against a median of 42.4 — close to the median. Across 25 quarterly filings AMOM has held roughly steady since 2020-04-30 (28.4 then, 30.2 now). Between the 2026-01-31 and 2026-04-30 filings 7 positions were added and 7 dropped; 16.0% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Every filing since 2020

25

Between 2020-04-30 and 2026-04-30, AMOM went from behaving like 28.4 equally weighted positions to 30.2 — 6% more, while its top ten went from 45.46% to 44.34% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

PeriodHoldingsEffective Top 10Largest
2026-04-30 51 30.2 44.34% 8.71%
2026-01-31 51 30.4 44.72% 8.77%
2025-10-31 51 30.3 46.09% 9.26%
2025-07-31 51 29.4 45.04% 10.04%
2025-04-30 51 30.6 46.68% 8.71%
2025-01-31 51 31.3 43.52% 7.72%
2024-10-31 51 25.8 50.77% 9.93%
2024-07-31 51 29.5 45.14% 8.7%
Earlier filings (17 more, back to 2020-04-30)
PeriodHoldingsEffectiveTop 10Largest
2024-04-30 51 29.2 46.5% 9.11%
2024-01-31 51 27.3 50.46% 9.02%
2023-10-31 51 24.6 51.62% 8.36%
2023-07-31 51 25.9 49.94% 7.99%
2023-04-28 51 33 42.03% 8.01%
2023-01-31 51 30.8 44.42% 7.39%
2022-10-31 51 34.9 38.78% 7.76%
2022-07-29 51 32.7 42.08% 7.78%
2022-04-29 51 38.2 36.34% 7.66%
2022-01-31 51 29.6 48.28% 8.32%
2021-10-29 51 36.9 35.88% 7.57%
2021-07-30 51 45.8 30.33% 3.85%
2021-04-30 51 35.6 37.24% 8.61%
2021-01-29 51 31.2 43.19% 7.97%
2020-10-30 51 32.4 41.56% 7.99%
2020-07-31 52 33.1 40.25% 9.3%
2020-04-30 49 28.4 45.46% 8.55%

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

Compared with, in the essays

4
QRFT · 1 MTUM · 1 VOO · 1 AIEQ · 1

By country of issuer

as of 2026-04-30

Share of AMOM's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

CountryShare
United States 96.36%
Ireland° 2.40%
Liberia° 1.25%

Returns the fund reported

2020-02 – 2026-04

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of AMOM's own filings, 75 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

40.4%Last twelve months filed
151%Whole series, compounded
17.6%Best month
-15.5%Worst month

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: AMOM.json · all funds.

Since the previous filing

2026-01-31 → 2026-04-30

51 positions became 51: 7 added (11.5% of the fund at the later date), 7 dropped (11.5% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 16.0%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of AMOM compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

Largest increases2026-01-312026-04-30Largest decreases2026-01-312026-04-30
BROADCOM INC5.09%5.62% ELI LILLY & COMPANY4.60%4.04%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC1.87%2.40% LAM RESEARCH CORP2.13%1.62%
WESTERN DIGITAL CORP1.82%2.28% ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD1.64%1.25%
ALPHABET INC6.84%7.30% APPLIED MATERIALS INC1.89%1.57%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC2.37%2.76% GE AEROSPACE2.75%2.46%
QUANTA SERVICES INC1.45%1.80% MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC2.96%2.68%

New: META PLATFORMS INC (5.07%), INTEL CORP (2.48%), CENCORA INC (1.17%), STEEL DYNAMICS INC (1.08%), WILLIAMS SONOMA INC (0.78%), HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES INC (0.66%). Gone: Tesla Inc (5.51%), Morgan Stanley (2.66%), Axon Enterprise Inc (0.95%), Synchrony Financial (0.82%), Fox Corporation (0.70%), Invesco Ltd (0.66%).

Asset categories and pricing

as of 2026-07-31

99.51% equity, 0.49% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Neighbours by effective holdings, equity funds

10

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of AMOM (38.5). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.

FundReportsBehaves likeTop tenAs of
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund 506 38 * 42.57% 2026-06-30
IPKW Invesco International BuyBack AchieversTM ETF 160 38 43.72% 2026-07-31
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF 55 38.1 37.55% 2026-06-30
FVAL Fidelity Value Factor ETF 127 38.1 42.28% 2026-07-31
VGSR Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF 144 38.4 44.92% 2026-06-30
EWJV iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF 110 38.8 40.62% 2026-05-31
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF 2,697 38.9 33.92% 2026-05-31
DUHP Dimensional US High Profitability ETF 150 39.3 41.44% 2026-07-31
EMGF iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF 631 39.3 35.68% 2026-05-31
SEEM SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF 264 39.3 36.11% 2026-06-30

Measures applied in the essays

8

Essays that examine AMOM

22

Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.