Fund index
SIZE
3 articles on this site analyse SIZE — 1 of them head-on.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-04-30SIZE reports 540 positions, but the weights make it behave like about 403.9 equally weighted ones. Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing — see what this measure does not tell you and the full table.
The same filing says what kind of price those positions carry: 100% of SIZE is held at a quoted market price, across 14 issuer countries . Comparisons across every fund are in the valuation table, and what a low share does and does not mean is worth reading before drawing a conclusion from it.
Every filing since 2019
27Between 2019-10-31 and 2026-04-30, SIZE went from behaving like 287.8 equally weighted positions to 403.9 — 40% more, while its top ten went from 6.99% to 5.71% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | 540 | 403.9 | 5.71% | 2.15% |
| 2026-01-31 | 547 | 462.9 | 4.13% | 1.67% |
| 2025-10-31 | 547 | 425.2 | 5.67% | 1.97% |
| 2025-07-31 | 545 | 452.3 | 4.47% | 1.8% |
| 2025-04-30 | 578 | 464.2 | 4.48% | 1.9% |
| 2025-01-31 | 593 | 433.3 | 4.76% | 2.41% |
| 2024-10-31 | 595 | 480.3 | 4.4% | 1.84% |
| 2024-07-31 | 603 | 442.1 | 4.49% | 2.39% |
| 2024-04-30 | 613 | 427.4 | 5.31% | 2.53% |
| 2024-01-31 | 613 | 359.1 | 5.54% | 3.35% |
| 2023-10-31 | 627 | 294.5 | 6.31% | 4.18% |
| 2023-07-31 | 631 | 269.9 | 6.85% | 4.56% |
| 2023-04-30 | 629 | 261.1 | 7.05% | 4.67% |
| 2023-01-31 | 631 | 215.5 | 7.56% | 5.49% |
| 2022-10-31 | 629 | 272.5 | 7.17% | 4.46% |
| 2022-07-31 | 631 | 174.2 | 8.42% | 6.42% |
| 2022-04-30 | 628 | 383.3 | 5.55% | 2.97% |
| 2022-01-31 | 630 | 430.6 | 4.71% | 2.6% |
| 2021-10-31 | 630 | 417.1 | 5.52% | 2.67% |
| 2021-07-31 | 630 | 385.6 | 5.44% | 3.08% |
| 2021-04-30 | 625 | 461.7 | 4.62% | 2.22% |
| 2021-01-31 | 625 | 458.4 | 4.66% | 2.3% |
| 2020-10-31 | 621 | 493.9 | 4.84% | 1.76% |
| 2020-07-31 | 622 | 399.5 | 5.13% | 2.9% |
| 2020-04-30 | 641 | 184.4 | 9.14% | 6.1% |
| 2020-01-31 | 639 | 332.5 | 6% | 3.76% |
| 2019-10-31 | 640 | 287.8 | 6.99% | 4.29% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Most often compared against
2Measures applied to it
2All articles
3-
The Hidden Cost of Turnover: How Rebalancing and Reconstitution Erode Factor-ETF Returns
Factor ETFs carry a cost the expense ratio never shows: the trading friction of periodic reconstitution and rebalancing, which is absorbed inside net asset...
-
VGT vs QQQ: Tech Sector vs Nasdaq-100 — How Different Are They Really?
VGT is a pure GICS Information Technology sector fund; QQQ is the Nasdaq-100, a multi-sector index that excludes some of the names most people assume are...
-
How Factor Loadings Drift: Watching MTUM, QUAL, and SIZE Over Five Years
The three iShares single-factor ETFs all carry the same 0.15% fee, but their realized 5Y CAGRs differ by 6.0 percentage points — that gap is mostly about...
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.