Fund · KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF · measured from SEC filings
KWEB holdings
KWEB reports 33 holdings and behaves like 19.7 equally weighted ones, computed from its SEC Form N-PORT filing for 2026-06-30. The fact sheet publishes the first number; this page computes the second, and traces it across 28 quarters of filings.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-06-30Read this figure with the following in mind
4.6% of net assets is securities-lending cash collateral, excluded from the figure; counted as filed the fund would read 19.0
The figure below is what the filing says, published unchanged. What it may not do is sit beside a plain long-only fund and be read as the same quantity. How comparability is decided.
Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), 2 issuer countries, 11.52% restricted securities.
What stands out
as of 2026-06-30KWEB's largest investment is Tencent Holdings Ltd at 10.09% of net assets. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd and PDD Holdings Inc Depositary Receipt follow; the three together are 27.81%. Ten companies are 60.21% of the fund; the other 23 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, KWEB behaves like 19.7 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 2.2 times more concentrated than the median. Across 28 quarterly filings KWEB has held roughly steady since 2019-09-30 (18.6 then, 19.7 now). Between the 2026-03-31 and 2026-06-30 filings 2 positions were added and 1 dropped; 7.7% of the weight moved. Hong Kong is the largest country at 69.04% of the portfolio, across 2 countries in the filing.
Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.
Every filing since 2019
28Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, KWEB went from behaving like 18.6 equally weighted positions to 19.7 — 6% more, while its top ten went from 63.67% to 60.21% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | 33 | 19.7 | 60.21% | 10.47% |
| 2026-03-31 | 32 | 19 | 62.28% | 10.1% |
| 2025-12-31 | 31 | 19.2 | 60.93% | 10.25% |
| 2025-09-30 | 29 | 17.9 | 62.31% | 11.4% |
| 2025-06-30 | 28 | 19.4 | 59.71% | 10.02% |
| 2025-03-31 | 29 | 17.6 | 61.58% | 12.17% |
| 2024-12-31 | 29 | 19 | 59.08% | 10.86% |
| 2024-09-30 | 33 | 17.8 | 62.87% | 11.03% |
Earlier filings (20 more, back to 2019-09-30)
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-30 | 32 | 18.9 | 61.05% | 10.51% |
| 2024-03-31 | 32 | 19.2 | 62.23% | 9.77% |
| 2023-12-31 | 32 | 19.6 | 59.6% | 9.51% |
| 2023-09-30 | 31 | 19.3 | 61.51% | 9.52% |
| 2023-06-30 | 31 | 19.7 | 59.9% | 9.78% |
| 2023-03-31 | 32 | 19.1 | 60.58% | 11.86% |
| 2022-12-31 | 32 | 19.6 | 60% | 10.65% |
| 2022-09-30 | 42 | 19.3 | 64.66% | 9.18% |
| 2022-06-30 | 43 | 20.1 | 60.49% | 9.98% |
| 2022-03-31 | 49 | 18.4 | 64.57% | 10.99% |
| 2021-12-31 | 54 | 23.4 | 55.35% | 10.35% |
| 2021-09-30 | 51 | 18.4 | 66.27% | 11.12% |
| 2021-06-30 | 52 | 20.7 | 60.91% | 9.49% |
| 2021-03-31 | 43 | 19 | 63.05% | 10.88% |
| 2020-12-31 | 44 | 20.4 | 60.88% | 9.61% |
| 2020-09-30 | 33 | 19.2 | 60.92% | 10.71% |
| 2020-06-30 | 48 | 21.1 | 59.41% | 9.25% |
| 2020-03-31 | 46 | 19.5 | 62.46% | 10.04% |
| 2019-12-31 | 45 | 20.4 | 59.99% | 10.1% |
| 2019-09-30 | 42 | 18.6 | 63.67% | 10.04% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Compared with, in the essays
4Overlap with other funds
4Measured against every other fund on this site, from the same filings. Combined effective holdings is how the pair behaves held in equal size.
| With | Overlap | Shared | Combined effective |
|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB vs FXI | 21.02% | 5 | 31.9 |
| KWEB vs MCHI | 19.18% | 14 | 32 |
| KWEB vs EWT | 0% | 0 | 36.9 |
| KWEB vs EWY | 0% | 0 | 19 |
As filed, collateral included
4.63% collateralKWEB's filing lists 34 positions including 4.63% of net assets in securities-lending cash collateral. Counted as filed the fund reads 19 effective holdings with a top ten of 60.8%; on its own investments — the figure above — it reads 19.7 with a top ten of 60.21%. The collateral is matched by a liability and is not a holding the fund chose; since 2026-09-18 every figure on this site sets it aside (methodology). Both numbers are in the data.
Largest positions, as filed
as of 2026-03-31The 15 largest of 33 positions in KWEB's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: KWEB.csv.gz.
| # | Position | Weight | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tencent Holdings Limited | 10.10% | 10.1% |
| 2 | Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 8.94% | 19.0% |
| 3 | PDD Holdings Inc. | 8.79% | 27.8% |
| 4 | MEITUAN | 7.36% | 35.2% |
| 5 | NETEASE, INC. | 5.92% | 41.1% |
| 6 | JD.COM, INC. | 4.92% | 46.0% |
| 7 | Ke Holdings Inc | 4.34% | 50.4% |
| 8 | BAIDU, INC. | 4.28% | 54.7% |
| 9 | JD Health International Inc | 4.02% | 58.7% |
| 10 | Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd | 3.60% | 62.3% |
| 11 | TRIP.COM GROUP LIMITED | 3.57% | 65.9% |
| 12 | KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY | 3.33% | 69.2% |
| 13 | TAL EDUCATION GROUP | 3.24% | 72.4% |
| 14 | BILIBILI INC. | 3.18% | 75.6% |
| 15 | Kanzhun Ltd | 2.86% | 78.5% |
By country of issuer
as of 2026-06-30Share of KWEB's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.
| Country | Share |
|---|---|
| Hong Kong SAR China | 72.25% |
| United States | 27.75% |
Returns the fund reported
2019-07 – 2026-06Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of KWEB's own filings, 84 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.
No compounded figure is shown. This site's two readings of KWEB's monthly returns — the filed figures and a series computed from prices — differ by a median of 4.30 percentage points over 84 months, more than distributions explain. Which is wrong cannot be told from the filings; the others in the same position are listed here.
Who borrows KWEB's shares
2026-06-30The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-06-30, $213m was out to 5 borrowers, 4.34% of net assets. The largest, MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INTERNATIONAL PLC, held 52.3% of it.
| Borrower | On loan | Share of the loan |
|---|---|---|
| MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INTERNATIONAL PLC | $111m | 52.3% |
| Barclays Capital Securities Ltd. | $74m | 35.0% |
| UBS AG | $18m | 8.6% |
| MORGAN STANLEY & CO LLC | $5m | 2.3% |
| BofA Securities, Inc. | $4m | 1.8% |
Cash collateral reported against the loan: 4.63% of net assets, 106.8% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter KWEB has filed, with each borrower: KWEB.json · all funds.
Since the previous filing
2026-03-31 → 2026-06-3032 positions became 33: 2 added (2.4% of the fund at the later date), 1 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 7.7%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of KWEB compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.
| Largest increases | 2026-03-31 | 2026-06-30 | Largest decreases | 2026-03-31 | 2026-06-30 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NETEASE, INC. | 5.92% | 6.99% | Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 8.94% | 7.72% |
| TENCENT MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT GROUP | 2.50% | 3.40% | JD.COM, INC. | 4.92% | 3.88% |
| KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY | 3.33% | 4.09% | PDD Holdings Inc. | 8.79% | 7.94% |
| Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd | 3.60% | 4.17% | ALIBABA HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LIMITED | 2.24% | 1.68% |
| BILIBILI INC. | 3.18% | 3.66% | MEITUAN | 7.36% | 6.84% |
| Tencent Holdings Limited | 10.10% | 10.47% | JD Health International Inc | 4.02% | 3.51% |
New: China Ruyi Holdings Limited (1.41%), MEITU, INC. (1.01%). Gone: BROWN BROTHERS HARRIMAN & CO. (0.00%).
Asset categories and pricing
as of 2026-06-3095.56% equity, 4.44% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.
Neighbours by effective holdings, equity funds
10Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of KWEB (19.7). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.
| Fund | Reports | Behaves like | Top ten | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 230 | 19.4 | 57.31% | 2026-07-31 |
| NORW Global X MSCI Norway ETF | 60 | 19.6 | 58.96% | 2026-07-31 |
| EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 664 | 19.7 | 44.17% | 2026-05-31 |
| FRDM Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF | 128 | 19.7 | 56.47% | 2026-06-30 |
| CNEQ Alger Concentrated Equity ETF | 30 | 19.7 | 59.33% | 2026-06-30 |
| VUG Vanguard Growth Index Fund | 151 | 19.8 | 60.41% | 2026-06-30 |
| VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund | 150 | 19.8 | 60.1% | 2026-05-31 |
| FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund | 42 | 19.8 | 60.91% | 2026-06-30 |
| NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF | 38 | 19.8 | 61.02% | 2026-05-31 |
| BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 31 | 19.8 | 59.72% | 2026-05-31 |
Essays that examine KWEB
2-
KWEB vs FXI vs MCHI: Three Very Different Ways to Own China
These three funds share a "China" label but are not three flavors of the same trade: KWEB is an internet-sector fund, FXI is a state-heavy large-cap fund,...
-
EWY vs EWT vs KWEB: The Geography of the AI Chip Trade
"Korea," "Taiwan," and "China internet" are marketing labels; under the hood, EWY is largely a memory-chip bet, EWT is a TSMC-centric logic-foundry bet, and...
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.