257 essays 1,087 funds measured independent · not paid by any fund or issuer we cover

Fund · KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF · measured from SEC filings

KWEB holdings

KWEB reports 33 holdings and behaves like 19.7 equally weighted ones, computed from its SEC Form N-PORT filing for 2026-06-30. The fact sheet publishes the first number; this page computes the second, and traces it across 28 quarters of filings.

Measured concentration

as of 2026-06-30

Read this figure with the following in mind

4.6% of net assets is securities-lending cash collateral, excluded from the figure; counted as filed the fund would read 19.0

The figure below is what the filing says, published unchanged. What it may not do is sit beside a plain long-only fund and be read as the same quantity. How comparability is decided.

33 Positions reported
19.7 Effective holdings
1.7× Concentration multiple
60.21% Top ten weight

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), 2 issuer countries, 11.52% restricted securities.

What stands out

as of 2026-06-30

KWEB's largest investment is Tencent Holdings Ltd at 10.09% of net assets. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd and PDD Holdings Inc Depositary Receipt follow; the three together are 27.81%. Ten companies are 60.21% of the fund; the other 23 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, KWEB behaves like 19.7 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 2.2 times more concentrated than the median. Across 28 quarterly filings KWEB has held roughly steady since 2019-09-30 (18.6 then, 19.7 now). Between the 2026-03-31 and 2026-06-30 filings 2 positions were added and 1 dropped; 7.7% of the weight moved. Hong Kong is the largest country at 69.04% of the portfolio, across 2 countries in the filing.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Every filing since 2019

28

Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, KWEB went from behaving like 18.6 equally weighted positions to 19.7 — 6% more, while its top ten went from 63.67% to 60.21% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

PeriodHoldingsEffective Top 10Largest
2026-06-30 33 19.7 60.21% 10.47%
2026-03-31 32 19 62.28% 10.1%
2025-12-31 31 19.2 60.93% 10.25%
2025-09-30 29 17.9 62.31% 11.4%
2025-06-30 28 19.4 59.71% 10.02%
2025-03-31 29 17.6 61.58% 12.17%
2024-12-31 29 19 59.08% 10.86%
2024-09-30 33 17.8 62.87% 11.03%
Earlier filings (20 more, back to 2019-09-30)
PeriodHoldingsEffectiveTop 10Largest
2024-06-30 32 18.9 61.05% 10.51%
2024-03-31 32 19.2 62.23% 9.77%
2023-12-31 32 19.6 59.6% 9.51%
2023-09-30 31 19.3 61.51% 9.52%
2023-06-30 31 19.7 59.9% 9.78%
2023-03-31 32 19.1 60.58% 11.86%
2022-12-31 32 19.6 60% 10.65%
2022-09-30 42 19.3 64.66% 9.18%
2022-06-30 43 20.1 60.49% 9.98%
2022-03-31 49 18.4 64.57% 10.99%
2021-12-31 54 23.4 55.35% 10.35%
2021-09-30 51 18.4 66.27% 11.12%
2021-06-30 52 20.7 60.91% 9.49%
2021-03-31 43 19 63.05% 10.88%
2020-12-31 44 20.4 60.88% 9.61%
2020-09-30 33 19.2 60.92% 10.71%
2020-06-30 48 21.1 59.41% 9.25%
2020-03-31 46 19.5 62.46% 10.04%
2019-12-31 45 20.4 59.99% 10.1%
2019-09-30 42 18.6 63.67% 10.04%

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

Compared with, in the essays

4

Overlap with other funds

4

Measured against every other fund on this site, from the same filings. Combined effective holdings is how the pair behaves held in equal size.

WithOverlapSharedCombined effective
KWEB vs FXI 21.02% 5 31.9
KWEB vs MCHI 19.18% 14 32
KWEB vs EWT 0% 0 36.9
KWEB vs EWY 0% 0 19

As filed, collateral included

4.63% collateral

KWEB's filing lists 34 positions including 4.63% of net assets in securities-lending cash collateral. Counted as filed the fund reads 19 effective holdings with a top ten of 60.8%; on its own investments — the figure above — it reads 19.7 with a top ten of 60.21%. The collateral is matched by a liability and is not a holding the fund chose; since 2026-09-18 every figure on this site sets it aside (methodology). Both numbers are in the data.

Largest positions, as filed

as of 2026-03-31

The 15 largest of 33 positions in KWEB's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: KWEB.csv.gz.

#PositionWeightCumulative
1Tencent Holdings Limited10.10%10.1%
2Alibaba Group Holding Limited8.94%19.0%
3PDD Holdings Inc.8.79%27.8%
4MEITUAN7.36%35.2%
5NETEASE, INC.5.92%41.1%
6JD.COM, INC.4.92%46.0%
7Ke Holdings Inc4.34%50.4%
8BAIDU, INC.4.28%54.7%
9JD Health International Inc4.02%58.7%
10Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd3.60%62.3%
11TRIP.COM GROUP LIMITED3.57%65.9%
12KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY3.33%69.2%
13TAL EDUCATION GROUP3.24%72.4%
14BILIBILI INC.3.18%75.6%
15Kanzhun Ltd2.86%78.5%

By country of issuer

as of 2026-06-30

Share of KWEB's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

CountryShare
Hong Kong SAR China 72.25%
United States 27.75%

Returns the fund reported

2019-07 – 2026-06

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of KWEB's own filings, 84 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

45.5%Best month
-27.3%Worst month

No compounded figure is shown. This site's two readings of KWEB's monthly returns — the filed figures and a series computed from prices — differ by a median of 4.30 percentage points over 84 months, more than distributions explain. Which is wrong cannot be told from the filings; the others in the same position are listed here.

Who borrows KWEB's shares

2026-06-30

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-06-30, $213m was out to 5 borrowers, 4.34% of net assets. The largest, MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INTERNATIONAL PLC, held 52.3% of it.

BorrowerOn loanShare of the loan
MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INTERNATIONAL PLC $111m 52.3%
Barclays Capital Securities Ltd. $74m 35.0%
UBS AG $18m 8.6%
MORGAN STANLEY & CO LLC $5m 2.3%
BofA Securities, Inc. $4m 1.8%

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 4.63% of net assets, 106.8% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter KWEB has filed, with each borrower: KWEB.json · all funds.

Since the previous filing

2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30

32 positions became 33: 2 added (2.4% of the fund at the later date), 1 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 7.7%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of KWEB compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

Largest increases2026-03-312026-06-30Largest decreases2026-03-312026-06-30
NETEASE, INC.5.92%6.99% Alibaba Group Holding Limited8.94%7.72%
TENCENT MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT GROUP2.50%3.40% JD.COM, INC.4.92%3.88%
KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY3.33%4.09% PDD Holdings Inc.8.79%7.94%
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd3.60%4.17% ALIBABA HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LIMITED2.24%1.68%
BILIBILI INC.3.18%3.66% MEITUAN7.36%6.84%
Tencent Holdings Limited10.10%10.47% JD Health International Inc4.02%3.51%

New: China Ruyi Holdings Limited (1.41%), MEITU, INC. (1.01%). Gone: BROWN BROTHERS HARRIMAN & CO. (0.00%).

Asset categories and pricing

as of 2026-06-30

95.56% equity, 4.44% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Neighbours by effective holdings, equity funds

10

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of KWEB (19.7). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.

FundReportsBehaves likeTop tenAs of
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF 230 19.4 57.31% 2026-07-31
NORW Global X MSCI Norway ETF 60 19.6 58.96% 2026-07-31
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF 664 19.7 44.17% 2026-05-31
FRDM Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF 128 19.7 56.47% 2026-06-30
CNEQ Alger Concentrated Equity ETF 30 19.7 59.33% 2026-06-30
VUG Vanguard Growth Index Fund 151 19.8 60.41% 2026-06-30
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund 150 19.8 60.1% 2026-05-31
FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund 42 19.8 60.91% 2026-06-30
NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF 38 19.8 61.02% 2026-05-31
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF 31 19.8 59.72% 2026-05-31

Essays that examine KWEB

2

Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.