FRDM holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 99.82% at a quoted market price (level 1), 12 issuer countries, 0.06% restricted securities.

FRDM's largest investment is Samsung Electronics Co Ltd at 13.07% of net assets. SK Hynix Inc and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd follow; the three together are 33.87%. Ten companies are 56.47% of the fund; the other 118 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, FRDM behaves like 19.7 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 2.2 times more concentrated than the median. Across 25 quarterly filings FRDM has become more concentrated: it behaved like 30.9 at 2020-03-31 and 19.7 at 2026-06-30. South Korea is the largest country at 28.54% of the portfolio, across 12 countries in the filing.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2020-03-31 and 2026-06-30, FRDM went from behaving like 30.9 equally weighted positions to 19.7 — 36% fewer, while its top ten went from 45.25% to 56.47% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 128 positions in FRDM's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: FRDM.csv.gz.

Share of FRDM's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of FRDM's own filings, 75 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.58 percentage points over 75 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: FRDM.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-06-30, $6m was out to 5 borrowers, 0.17% of net assets. The largest, MORGAN STANLEY & CO LLC, held 48.5% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 0.17% of net assets, 102.1% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter FRDM has filed, with each borrower: FRDM.json · all funds.

127 positions became 127: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 17.2%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of FRDM compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

99.39% equity, 0.60% short-term investment as filed; 99.8% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1), 0.0% at level 3. Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of FRDM (19.7). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.