GCOW holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), 22 issuer countries.

GCOW's largest investment is Equinor ASA at 2.56% of net assets. TotalEnergies SE and Rio Tinto PLC follow; the three together are 7.43%. Ten companies are 20.57% of the fund; the other 91 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, GCOW behaves like 70.1 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 1.6 times the median. Across 26 quarterly filings GCOW has held roughly steady since 2019-10-31 (68.8 then, 64.8 now). the United States is the largest country at 17.93% of the portfolio, across 22 countries in the filing.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-10-31 and 2026-04-30, GCOW went from behaving like 68.8 equally weighted positions to 64.8 — 6% fewer, while its top ten went from 22.14% to 23.24% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 101 positions in GCOW's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: GCOW.csv.gz.

Share of GCOW's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of GCOW's own filings, 78 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.17 percentage points over 78 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: GCOW.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-04-30, $13m was out to 1 borrower, 0.39% of net assets.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 0.42% of net assets, 107% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter GCOW has filed, with each borrower: GCOW.json · all funds.

102 positions became 102: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 5.2%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of GCOW compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

100.0% of GCOW is carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's, from Form N-PORT; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of GCOW (70.1). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.