DBJP holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 98.26% at a quoted market price (level 1), 2 issuer countries.

DBJP's largest investment is Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc NPV at 3.86% of net assets. Toyota Motor Corp NPV and Softbank Group Corp NPV follow; the three together are 10.69%. Ten companies are 28.1% of the fund; the other 165 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, DBJP behaves like 70.3 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 1.7 times the median. Across 27 quarterly filings DBJP has become more concentrated: it behaved like 119.6 at 2019-11-29 and 70.3 at 2026-05-29. Between the 2026-02-27 and 2026-05-29 filings 4 positions were added and 18 dropped; 12.5% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-11-29 and 2026-05-29, DBJP went from behaving like 119.6 equally weighted positions to 70.3 — 41% fewer, while its top ten went from 19.07% to 28.1% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 175 positions in DBJP's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: DBJP.csv.gz.

Share of DBJP's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of DBJP's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: DBJP.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-02-27, $7m was out to 5 borrowers, 1.08% of net assets. The largest, STATE STREET BANK & TRUST COMPANY, held 45.4% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 1.21% of net assets, 112.4% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter DBJP has filed, with each borrower: DBJP.json · all funds.

185 positions became 171: 4 added (2.9% of the fund at the later date), 18 dropped (3.3% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 12.5%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of DBJP compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC (1.74%), FURUKAWA ELECTRIC CO LTD (THE) (0.41%), RESONAC HOLDINGS CORP (0.40%), MITSUI KINZOKU CO LTD (0.34%). Gone: MORGAN STANLEY CAPITAL SERVICES LLC (1.23%), iShares Trust (0.47%), Toyota Industries Corp. (0.39%), Sekisui Chemical Co Ltd. (0.14%), Shimadzu Corporation (0.12%), Tokyu Corp (0.11%).

98.3% of DBJP is carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's, from Form N-PORT; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $660M. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of DBJP (70.3). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.