IBTE holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 32.8% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

IBTE's largest investment is U.S. Treasury Bills at 54.89% of net assets. BlackRock Cash Funds: Treasury, SL Agency Shares and U.S. Treasury Notes follow; the three together are 80.93%. Ten companies are 100% of the fund; the other -3 share the rest. Among the 12 short-term funds measured here, IBTE behaves like 2.8 holdings against a median of 9.5 — 3.4 times more concentrated than the median. Across 19 quarterly filings IBTE has become more concentrated: it behaved like 6.4 at 2020-04-30 and 2.8 at 2024-10-31. Between the 2024-07-31 and 2024-10-31 filings 1 positions were added and 11 dropped; 55.2% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable short-term funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2020-04-30 and 2024-10-31, IBTE went from behaving like 6.4 equally weighted positions to 2.8 — 56% fewer, while its top ten went from 100% to 100% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

IBTE's filing lists 8 positions including 22.14% of net assets in securities-lending cash collateral. Counted as filed the fund reads 2.5 effective holdings with a top ten of 121.85%; on its own investments — the figure above — it reads 2.8 with a top ten of 100%. The collateral is matched by a liability and is not a holding the fund chose; since 2026-09-18 every figure on this site sets it aside (methodology). Both numbers are in the data.

The 7 largest of 7 positions in IBTE's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: IBTE.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of IBTE's own filings, 57 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: IBTE.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2024-10-31, $347m was out to 2 borrowers, 19.29% of net assets. The largest, JP MORGAN SECURITIES LLC, held 98.6% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 22.14% of net assets, 114.8% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter IBTE has filed, with each borrower: IBTE.json · all funds.

17 positions became 7: 1 added (55.0% of the fund at the later date), 11 dropped (55.1% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 55.2%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of IBTE compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: United States of America (55.04%). Gone: United States of America (7.52%), United States of America (7.38%), United States of America (7.24%), United States of America (6.01%), United States of America (5.95%), United States of America (5.26%).

77.84% short-term investment, 22.16% debt as filed; 32.8% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured short-term investment fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of IBTE (2.8). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.