IBDQ holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 73.2% at a quoted market price (level 1), 6 issuer countries.

The largest line in IBDQ's filing is not a stock but BlackRock Cash Funds: Treasury, SL Agency Shares, a short-term position at 72.7% of net assets. Ten companies are 82.93% of the fund; the other 58 share the rest. Among the 12 short-term funds measured here, IBDQ behaves like 1.9 holdings against a median of 9.5 — 5.0 times more concentrated than the median. Across 25 quarterly filings IBDQ has become more concentrated: it behaved like 218.4 at 2019-10-31 and 1.9 at 2025-10-31. Between the 2025-07-31 and 2025-10-31 filings 0 positions were added and 143 dropped; 52.6% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable short-term funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-10-31 and 2025-10-31, IBDQ went from behaving like 218.4 equally weighted positions to 1.9 — 99% fewer, while its top ten went from 10.81% to 82.93% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 68 positions in IBDQ's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: IBDQ.csv.gz.

Share of IBDQ's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of IBDQ's own filings, 75 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: IBDQ.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2025-07-31, $68m was out to 16 borrowers, 2.32% of net assets. The largest, GOLDMAN SACHS & CO., held 33.1% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 2.41% of net assets, 103.7% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter IBDQ has filed, with each borrower: IBDQ.json · all funds.

211 positions became 68: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 143 dropped (51.7% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 52.6%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of IBDQ compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

Gone: Comcast Corp (1.23%), HP ENTERPRISE CO (1.21%), WELLS FARGO & COMPANY (1.07%), NEXTERA ENERGY CAPITAL (0.92%), GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (0.87%), WALMART INC (0.81%).

73.20% short-term investment, 26.80% debt as filed; 73.2% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured short-term investment fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of IBDQ (1.9). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.