MSFU holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 93.24% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

The largest line in MSFU's filing is not a stock but Goldman Finl SQ Trsry Inst 506, a short-term position at 31.1% of net assets. Between the 2026-01-31 and 2026-04-30 filings 1 positions were added and 0 dropped; 18.1% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable short-term funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 5 largest of 6 positions in MSFU's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: MSFU.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of MSFU's own filings, 44 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: MSFU.json · all funds.

5 positions became 6: 1 added (2.7% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 18.1%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of MSFU compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: N/A (2.71%).

93.2% of MSFU is carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's, from Form N-PORT; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $847M. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Financing leg as filed: the fund pays 1 month Sofr + spread + 5.936% on $1.58B of long swap notional . Issuers fill the spread field differently (some file the all-in rate), so compare within an issuer, not across.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured short-term investment fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of MSFU (4.2). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.