BSJP holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 95.34% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

The largest line in BSJP's filing is not a stock but Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio, Institutional Class, a short-term position at 94.87% of net assets. Ten companies are 100% of the fund; the other -7 share the rest. Among the 12 short-term funds measured here, BSJP behaves like 1.1 holdings against a median of 9.5 — 8.3 times more concentrated than the median. Across 25 quarterly filings BSJP has become more concentrated: it behaved like 155.1 at 2019-11-30 and 1.1 at 2025-11-30. Between the 2025-08-31 and 2025-11-30 filings 0 positions were added and 6 dropped; 14.3% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable short-term funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-11-30 and 2025-11-30, BSJP went from behaving like 155.1 equally weighted positions to 1.1 — 99% fewer, while its top ten went from 13.67% to 100% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 3 largest of 3 positions in BSJP's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: BSJP.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of BSJP's own filings, 75 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: BSJP.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2025-05-31, $45m was out to 6 borrowers, 4.77% of net assets. The largest, GOLDMAN SACHS & CO., held 72% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 4.89% of net assets, 102.4% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter BSJP has filed, with each borrower: BSJP.json · all funds.

9 positions became 3: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 6 dropped (14.3% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 14.3%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of BSJP compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

Gone: United Wholesale Mortgage LLC (3.80%), Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (2.61%), Jones Deslauriers Insurance Management Inc. (2.52%), Raising Cane's Restaurants, L.L.C. (2.51%), Travel + Leisure Co. (1.73%), Welltec International ApS (1.11%).

95.34% short-term investment, 4.66% debt as filed; 95.3% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured short-term investment fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of BSJP (1.1). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.