EUSB holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 3.8% at a quoted market price (level 1), 53 issuer countries.

The largest line in EUSB's filing is not a stock but BlackRock Cash Funds: Treasury, SL Agency Shares, a short-term position at 3.2% of net assets. Ten companies are 6.99% of the fund; the other 4,223 share the rest. Among the 192 bond funds measured here, EUSB behaves like 479.3 holdings against a median of 236.4 — 2.0 times the median. Across 24 quarterly filings EUSB has become less concentrated: it behaved like 31.6 at 2020-08-31 and 479.3 at 2026-05-31. Between the 2026-02-28 and 2026-05-31 filings 333 positions were added and 306 dropped; 9.6% of the weight moved. the United States is the largest country at 87.02% of the portfolio, across 53 countries in the filing.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable bond funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2020-08-31 and 2026-05-31, EUSB went from behaving like 31.6 equally weighted positions to 479.3 — 1417% more, while its top ten went from 43.49% to 6.99% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 4,233 positions in EUSB's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: listed with the point-in-time files, available on request.

Share of EUSB's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of EUSB's own filings, 72 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: EUSB.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-05-31, $5m was out to 15 borrowers, 0.65% of net assets. The largest, BARCLAYS BANK PLC, held 22.1% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 0.67% of net assets, 103.8% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter EUSB has filed, with each borrower: EUSB.json · all funds.

4,206 positions became 4,233: 333 added (7.1% of the fund at the later date), 306 dropped (7.1% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 9.6%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of EUSB compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: United States Treasury (0.32%), UMBS, TBA (0.27%), United States Treasury (0.23%), United States Treasury (0.20%), United States Treasury (0.17%), Government National Mortgage Association (0.17%). Gone: Government National Mortgage Association (0.29%), United States Treasury (0.28%), United States Treasury (0.27%), United States Treasury (0.24%), Government National Mortgage Association (0.23%), United States Treasury (0.22%).

3.8% of EUSB is carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's, from Form N-PORT; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured debt fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of EUSB (479.3). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.