Fund index
AGG
11 articles on this site analyse AGG — 2 of them head-on.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-05-31AGG reports 13,269 positions, but the weights make it behave like about 537.5 equally weighted ones. Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing — see what this measure does not tell you and the full table.
The same filing says what kind of price those positions carry: 3.34% of AGG is held at a quoted market price, across 31 issuer countries . Comparisons across every fund are in the valuation table, and what a low share does and does not mean is worth reading before drawing a conclusion from it.
Every filing since 2019
27Between 2019-11-30 and 2026-05-31, AGG went from behaving like 264 equally weighted positions to 537.5 — 104% more, while its top ten went from 10.02% to 6.61% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-31 | 13,269 | 537.5 | 6.61% | 2.78% |
| 2026-02-28 | 13,185 | 472.6 | 7.11% | 3.19% |
| 2025-11-30 | 12,952 | 510 | 6.8% | 2.99% |
| 2025-08-31 | 12,725 | 555.2 | 6.63% | 2.68% |
| 2025-05-31 | 12,569 | 592.1 | 6.6% | 2.46% |
| 2025-02-28 | 12,371 | 492.3 | 7.28% | 3.04% |
| 2024-11-30 | 12,076 | 422.2 | 8.02% | 3.5% |
| 2024-08-31 | 11,834 | 378.5 | 7.93% | 3.96% |
| 2024-05-31 | 11,756 | 376.6 | 8.18% | 3.97% |
| 2024-02-29 | 11,630 | 421.5 | 8.34% | 3.19% |
| 2023-11-30 | 11,356 | 447.4 | 7.62% | 3.35% |
| 2023-08-31 | 11,116 | 312.4 | 9.18% | 4.48% |
| 2023-05-31 | 10,951 | 279.2 | 9.46% | 4.86% |
| 2023-02-28 | 10,803 | 303.5 | 9.3% | 4.47% |
| 2022-11-30 | 10,553 | 337.9 | 8.92% | 4.06% |
| 2022-08-31 | 10,415 | 248 | 11.37% | 4.89% |
| 2022-05-31 | 10,343 | 199.8 | 12.33% | 5.77% |
| 2022-02-28 | 10,053 | 140.2 | 14.1% | 7.36% |
| 2021-11-30 | 9,999 | 120.4 | 15.34% | 8.08% |
| 2021-08-31 | 9,718 | 91.3 | 18.2% | 9.26% |
| 2021-05-31 | 9,600 | 119.1 | 15.68% | 8.08% |
| 2021-02-28 | 9,456 | 123.3 | 14.43% | 8.12% |
| 2020-11-30 | 9,307 | 114.8 | 14.71% | 8.5% |
| 2020-08-31 | 9,202 | 103.1 | 16.17% | 8.95% |
| 2020-05-31 | 8,870 | 149.3 | 14.11% | 7.05% |
| 2020-02-29 | 8,595 | 198.8 | 11.65% | 5.9% |
| 2019-11-30 | 8,617 | 264 | 10.02% | 4.8% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Most often compared against
1Measures applied to it
7All articles
11-
The Diversification Return: Why Rebalancing Can Add Yield Even When Nothing Outperforms
A rebalanced portfolio can earn a higher compound (geometric) return than the weighted average of its parts — even if no single holding beats the others....
-
BNDX vs BND: Does Adding International Bonds Do Anything for a US Portfolio?
BNDX (international bonds) and BND (US bonds) have delivered nearly identical 10-year CAGRs — 1.5% and 1.4% respectively — which is not a coincidence,...
-
MUB vs BND: When Municipal Bonds Beat Taxable Bonds — The Tax-Equivalent Yield Math
On stated yield, BND (3.95%) pays more than MUB (3.16%) — but MUB's income is exempt from federal tax, so the honest comparison is the tax-equivalent yield,...
-
LQD vs HYG: Investment-Grade vs High-Yield Credit — What the Spread Actually Pays You For
The credit spread pays you for default risk — but over the last five years, the fund that lost more was the investment-grade one, not the high-yield one....
-
TIP vs SCHP vs VTIP: How Inflation-Protected Bond ETFs Differ by Duration
TIP and SCHP hold the full-maturity TIPS ladder and behave almost identically; the only durable difference between them is a 0.15% fee gap that favors SCHP....
-
TLT vs IEF vs SHY: Building a Treasury Duration Ladder for Different Rate Scenarios
TLT, IEF, and SHY charge the same 0.15% expense ratio, so this decision is not about cost — it is entirely about how much interest-rate duration you want to...
-
BND vs AGG: The Two Total-Bond Giants — Duration, Yield, and Tracking Difference
BND and AGG charge the identical 0.03% expense ratio, yield within two basis points of each other, and posted max drawdowns within 0.1 percentage points...
-
AGG vs. BNDI: Total Bond Market vs. AI-Driven Active Fixed Income Strategy
AGG and BNDI hold roughly the same investment-grade bond universe in their core. The difference is one decision: BNDI writes options on top of that core to...
-
Gold vs Bonds in 2026: Two Different Hedges, Two Different Risks
Gold and bonds get grouped as "safe havens", but they hedge different risks — real rates and fiat credibility for gold; nominal yields and growth...
-
What SGOV and Gold Actually Do: A Quant Look at Defensive Assets in 2026
SGOV's five-year realized volatility is 0.2% and its worst drawdown was 0.03% — it behaves like cash with a yield, not like a "bond." The 3.9% distribution...
-
SGOV and Gold in a 4.5% World: Rethinking the Defensive Sleeve for 2026
With SGOV's distribution yield at 3.9% and the 10-year Treasury at 4.47% (FRED, asof 2026-05-14), the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding gold is...
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.