VPLS holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 1.74% at a quoted market price (level 1), 73 issuer countries, 20.12% restricted securities.

VPLS's largest investment is Fncl 5 7/26 at 2.42% of net assets. Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund and Pmtlt 2026-inv1 A36 follow; the three together are 5.28%. Between the 2026-03-31 and 2026-06-30 filings 597 positions were added and 338 dropped; 41.4% of the weight moved. the United States is the largest country at 74.52% of the portfolio, across 73 countries in the filing.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable bond funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2023-12-31 and 2024-09-30, VPLS went from behaving like 41.4 equally weighted positions to 269.1 — 550% more, while its top ten went from 35.97% to 11.98% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 2,903 positions in VPLS's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: VPLS.csv.gz.

Share of VPLS's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of VPLS's own filings, 31 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: VPLS.json · all funds.

2,574 positions became 2,833: 597 added (35.7% of the fund at the later date), 338 dropped (27.5% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 41.4%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of VPLS compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (2.31%), Fannie Mae REMICS (0.92%), Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (0.86%), Fannie Mae REMICS (0.65%), NVIDIA Corp (0.63%), OBX 2026-INV2 Trust (0.61%). Gone: Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (1.70%), Ginnie Mae II Pool (1.51%), United States Treasury Note/Bond (1.34%), Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (1.29%), Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (1.21%), Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (0.83%).

1.7% of VPLS is carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1); 0.1% at level 3, priced from the filer's own inputs. Categories and levels are the filer's, from Form N-PORT; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $1.66B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Financing leg as filed: the fund pays MXIBTIIE + 0% on $506M of long swap notional . Issuers fill the spread field differently (some file the all-in rate), so compare within an issuer, not across.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured debt fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of VPLS (446.1). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.