CGMS holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 3.44% at a quoted market price (level 1), 32 issuer countries, 0.94% restricted securities.

The largest line in CGMS's filing is not a stock but Capital Group Central Cash Fund, a equity position at 3.12% of net assets. Ten companies are 6.76% of the fund; the other 1,483 share the rest. Among the 192 bond funds measured here, CGMS behaves like 422.4 holdings against a median of 236.4 — 1.8 times the median. Across 15 quarterly filings CGMS has become less concentrated: it behaved like 213.7 at 2022-12-31 and 422.4 at 2026-06-30. Between the 2026-03-31 and 2026-06-30 filings 183 positions were added and 152 dropped; 16.9% of the weight moved. the United States is the largest country at 87.99% of the portfolio, across 32 countries in the filing.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable bond funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2022-12-31 and 2026-06-30, CGMS went from behaving like 213.7 equally weighted positions to 422.4 — 98% more, while its top ten went from 13.25% to 6.76% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 1,493 positions in CGMS's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: CGMS.csv.gz.

Share of CGMS's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of CGMS's own filings, 45 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: CGMS.json · all funds.

1,438 positions became 1,469: 183 added (12.6% of the fund at the later date), 152 dropped (7.3% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 16.9%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of CGMS compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: RD MICHIGAN PROP OWNER I (0.60%), SPACE EXPLORATION TECH (0.30%), BX Trust (0.30%), ARES STRATEGIC INCOME FU (0.29%), HORSESHOE FUND TRST II (0.25%), RIO GRANDE LNG LLC (0.25%). Gone: ARES STRATEGIC INCOME FU (0.31%), Fannie Mae (0.27%), GOLDMAN SACHS PRIVATE CR (0.22%), AMGEN INC (0.20%), KENNEDY-WILSON INC (0.20%), DISCOVERY HOLDINGS INC (0.20%).

3.4% of CGMS is carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1); 0.1% at level 3, priced from the filer's own inputs. Categories and levels are the filer's, from Form N-PORT; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $5.17B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Financing leg as filed: the fund pays 1 day USD SOFR + 0% on $680M of long swap notional . Issuers fill the spread field differently (some file the all-in rate), so compare within an issuer, not across.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured debt fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of CGMS (422.4). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.