VBR holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

VBR's largest investment is Jabil Inc at 0.87% of net assets. NRG Energy and Tapestry Inc follow; the three together are 2.17%. Ten companies are 5.88% of the fund; the other 832 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, VBR behaves like 457.7 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 10.8 times the median. Across 28 quarterly filings VBR has held roughly steady since 2019-09-30 (487 then, 457.7 now). Between the 2026-03-31 and 2026-06-30 filings 46 positions were added and 44 dropped; 11.9% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, VBR went from behaving like 487 equally weighted positions to 457.7 — 6% fewer, while its top ten went from 5.42% to 5.88% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

Measured against every other fund on this site, from the same filings. Combined effective holdings is how the pair behaves held in equal size.

The 15 largest of 842 positions in VBR's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: VBR.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of VBR's own filings, 84 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.03 percentage points over 84 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: VBR.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-06-30, $479m was out to 26 borrowers, 0.71% of net assets. The largest, GOLDMAN SACHS & CO., held 18.7% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 0.64% of net assets, 90.5% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter VBR has filed, with each borrower: VBR.json · all funds.

837 positions became 839: 46 added (4.3% of the fund at the later date), 44 dropped (2.8% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 11.9%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of VBR compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: DuPont de Nemours Inc (0.40%), Fedex Freight Holding Co Inc (0.35%), International Paper Co (0.22%), Alliant Energy Corp (0.21%), International Flavors & Fragrances Inc (0.21%), Fortive Corp (0.20%). Gone: DuPont de Nemours Inc (0.45%), Hologic Inc (0.41%), XPO Inc (0.26%), Air Lease Corp (0.16%), Sealed Air Corp (0.15%), Solstice Advanced Materials Inc (0.15%).

99.09% equity, 0.91% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $67.80B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Financing leg as filed: the fund pays OBFR01 + 0% on $31M of long swap notional . Issuers fill the spread field differently (some file the all-in rate), so compare within an issuer, not across.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of VBR (457.7). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.

• 004 Expense ratio
• 004 Maximum drawdown
• 003 Standard deviation
• 003 Turnover

• XBI vs IBB: Equal-Weight vs Cap-Weight Biotech — Two Very Different Risk Profiles

  XBI weights biotech names roughly equally, tilting hard toward small- and mid-cap clinical-stage companies; IBB is cap-weighted and dominated by a handful...

  10 Aug 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• IJR vs IWM vs VB: Three Small-Cap Blend ETFs and Why Their Indexes Diverge

  IJR, IWM, and VB are all called "small-cap blend," but they track three different indexes — S&P SmallCap 600, Russell 2000, and CRSP US Small Cap — and...

  06 Aug 2026 9 min ETF Analysis

• VTV vs VUG: The Value-vs-Growth Split Inside the S&P 500 — What 15 Years of Data Show

  Over the trailing decade VUG compounded faster (18.1% vs 12.6% 10Y CAGR), but it did so with roughly double the realized volatility and a drawdown more than...

  16 Jul 2026 10 min ETF Analysis

• AVUV vs VBR: Small-Cap Value — Active Selection vs the Index Approach

  Both funds target U.S. small-cap value, but AVUV applies a more aggressive systematic tilt toward value and profitability, while VBR tracks a broad value...

  30 Jun 2026 8 min ETF Analysis