COPX holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 97.47% at a quoted market price (level 1), 10 issuer countries.

COPX's largest investment is Lundin Mining Corp at 6.06% of net assets. Glencore PLC and Sumitomo Metal Mining Co Ltd follow; the three together are 18.01%. Ten companies are 50.41% of the fund; the other 43 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, COPX behaves like 25.6 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 1.7 times more concentrated than the median. Across 27 quarterly filings COPX has held roughly steady since 2019-10-31 (22.5 then, 24.3 now). Between the 2026-01-31 and 2026-04-30 filings 0 positions were added and 2 dropped; 6.7% of the weight moved. Canada is the largest country at 32.47% of the portfolio, across 10 countries in the filing.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-10-31 and 2026-04-30, COPX went from behaving like 22.5 equally weighted positions to 24.3 — 8% more, while its top ten went from 53.75% to 53.39% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

COPX's filing lists 61 positions including 2.59% of net assets in securities-lending cash collateral. Counted as filed the fund reads 25.5 effective holdings with a top ten of 50.34%; on its own investments — the figure above — it reads 25.6 with a top ten of 50.41%. The collateral is matched by a liability and is not a holding the fund chose; since 2026-09-18 every figure on this site sets it aside (methodology). Both numbers are in the data.

The 15 largest of 53 positions in COPX's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: COPX.csv.gz.

Share of COPX's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of COPX's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

No compounded figure is shown. This site's two readings of COPX's monthly returns — the filed figures and a series computed from prices — differ by a median of 5.65 percentage points over 81 months, more than distributions explain. Which is wrong cannot be told from the filings; the others in the same position are listed here.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-07-31, $206m was out to 9 borrowers. The largest, HSBC BANK PLC, held 37% of it.

The filing reports no cash collateral position against this loan. Collateral taken in a form the fund does not hold as a position does not appear in N-PORT, so this is silence rather than absence. What the collateral figure can and cannot show. Every quarter COPX has filed, with each borrower: COPX.json · all funds.

41 positions became 39: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 2 dropped (0.9% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 6.7%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of COPX compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

Gone: Foran Mining Corp (0.61%), SOLGOLD PLC (0.28%).

97.47% equity, 2.53% repurchase agreement as filed; 97.5% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of COPX (25.6). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.