Fund index
IVV
7 articles on this site analyse IVV — 1 of them head-on.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-06-30IVV reports 508 positions, but the weights make it behave like about 51.5 equally weighted ones. Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing — see what this measure does not tell you and the full table.
The same filing says what kind of price those positions carry: 100% of IVV is held at a quoted market price, across 9 issuer countries . Comparisons across every fund are in the valuation table, and what a low share does and does not mean is worth reading before drawing a conclusion from it.
Every filing since 2019
28Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, IVV went from behaving like 111.1 equally weighted positions to 51.5 — 54% fewer, while its top ten went from 21.56% to 36.36% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | 508 | 51.5 | 36.36% | 7.51% |
| 2026-03-31 | 506 | 51.4 | 36.42% | 7.56% |
| 2025-12-31 | 506 | 45.9 | 39.16% | 7.74% |
| 2025-09-30 | 507 | 45.3 | 38.81% | 7.97% |
| 2025-06-30 | 508 | 49.2 | 36.54% | 7.32% |
| 2025-03-31 | 508 | 56.7 | 33.49% | 7% |
| 2024-12-31 | 505 | 48.3 | 37.25% | 7.58% |
| 2024-09-30 | 507 | 52.4 | 34.56% | 7.26% |
| 2024-06-30 | 506 | 50.1 | 35.68% | 7.23% |
| 2024-03-31 | 506 | 60.5 | 32.08% | 7.08% |
| 2023-12-31 | 506 | 61.5 | 30.78% | 7.01% |
| 2023-09-30 | 505 | 63.5 | 30.54% | 6.98% |
| 2023-06-30 | 506 | 60.3 | 30.42% | 7.7% |
| 2023-03-31 | 506 | 69.8 | 27.3% | 7.12% |
| 2022-12-31 | 505 | 83.8 | 24.59% | 6.03% |
| 2022-09-30 | 505 | 71.7 | 27.72% | 6.91% |
| 2022-06-30 | 506 | 74.1 | 26.88% | 6.57% |
| 2022-03-31 | 508 | 67.2 | 29.4% | 7.05% |
| 2021-12-31 | 508 | 67.8 | 29.27% | 6.84% |
| 2021-09-30 | 507 | 74.5 | 28.06% | 6.07% |
| 2021-06-30 | 508 | 76.9 | 27.37% | 5.9% |
| 2021-03-31 | 508 | 81.5 | 26.29% | 5.72% |
| 2020-12-31 | 508 | 72.7 | 27.32% | 6.68% |
| 2020-09-30 | 508 | 68.5 | 27.92% | 6.67% |
| 2020-06-30 | 509 | 73.3 | 26.91% | 6.01% |
| 2020-03-31 | 507 | 81.8 | 26.08% | 5.59% |
| 2019-12-31 | 508 | 102.4 | 22.68% | 4.57% |
| 2019-09-30 | 508 | 111.1 | 21.56% | 4.29% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Most often compared against
2Measures applied to it
7All articles
7-
How ETFs Barely Pay Capital-Gains Tax: In-Kind Redemption and 'Heartbeat' Trades Explained
ETFs rarely distribute capital gains because they hand appreciated securities to authorized participants "in kind" rather than selling them for cash — a...
-
SPY vs VOO vs IVV: The Three S&P 500 ETFs — Fees, Structure, and Tracking Difference
All three track the same S&P 500 index; over five years their total returns and drawdowns sit within a rounding error of one another. The real separation is...
-
Why Tracking Error Matters More Than Expense Ratio in 2026
VOO and IVV both charge 0.03%. The fee debate ends in a tie, which means the right framework question is no longer "which is cheaper?" but "which one tracks...
-
VTI vs. AIEQ: Total Market Index vs. IBM Watson’s AI Selection Performance
Over the trailing five years, VTI compounded at 11.8% annually while AIEQ — the IBM Watson-powered active equity ETF — compounded at 4.4%, a gap of roughly...
-
How Jim Simons Built the Medallion Fund: Lessons for the Modern AI Investor
Medallion's roughly 39% net annualized return over three decades is real, public, and almost entirely a function of capacity — capped near $10B and closed...
-
Tax-Loss Harvesting and the After-Tax Compounding Gap: What the Math Actually Shows
Over a 30-year horizon, a 1-percentage-point reduction in annual tax drag compounds into roughly a one-third increase in terminal wealth — not because of...
-
Two Layers, Defined Roles: A Framework for Long-Horizon ETF Allocation
A portfolio is not a list of tickers — it is a set of roles, and every position should answer one specific question about what job it does. A two-layer...
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.