FQAL holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 99.97% at a quoted market price (level 1), 3 issuer countries.

FQAL's largest investment is Nvidia Corp at 7.47% of net assets. Apple Inc and Alphabet Inc follow; the three together are 19.44%. Ten companies are 38.17% of the fund; the other 117 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, FQAL behaves like 40.6 holdings against a median of 42.4 — close to the median. Across 27 quarterly filings FQAL has become more concentrated: it behaved like 77.7 at 2019-10-31 and 40.7 at 2026-04-30. Between the 2026-01-31 and 2026-04-30 filings 17 positions were added and 18 dropped; 13.9% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-10-31 and 2026-04-30, FQAL went from behaving like 77.7 equally weighted positions to 40.7 — 48% fewer, while its top ten went from 23.12% to 39.79% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 127 positions in FQAL's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: FQAL.csv.gz.

Share of FQAL's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of FQAL's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.07 percentage points over 81 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: FQAL.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-07-31, $14m was out to 5 borrowers. The largest, MORGAN STANLEY & CO LLC, held 44.8% of it.

The filing reports no cash collateral position against this loan. Collateral taken in a form the fund does not hold as a position does not appear in N-PORT, so this is silence rather than absence. What the collateral figure can and cannot show. Every quarter FQAL has filed, with each borrower: FQAL.json · all funds.

127 positions became 126: 17 added (9.0% of the fund at the later date), 18 dropped (7.4% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 13.9%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of FQAL compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: CISCO SYSTEMS INC (1.15%), SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC (1.14%), KLA CORP (1.09%), COCA COLA CO (0.75%), AMERICAN EXPRESS CO (0.68%), BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO (0.64%). Gone: LOWES COS INC (1.02%), ARISTA NETWORKS INC (0.86%), APPLOVIN CORP (0.85%), ABBOTT LABORATORIES (0.69%), BLACKSTONE INC (0.59%), SEI INVESTMENTS CO (0.58%).

100.0% of FQAL is carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's, from Form N-PORT; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $1.37B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of FQAL (40.6). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.