ESGV holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

ESGV's largest investment is Nvidia Corp at 8.37% of net assets. Apple Inc and Microsoft Corp follow; the three together are 21.64%. Ten companies are 42.58% of the fund; the other 1,233 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, ESGV behaves like 40.4 holdings against a median of 42.4 — close to the median. Across 27 quarterly filings ESGV has become more concentrated: it behaved like 111.4 at 2019-11-30 and 40.4 at 2026-05-31. Between the 2026-02-28 and 2026-05-31 filings 28 positions were added and 49 dropped; 8.9% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-11-30 and 2026-05-31, ESGV went from behaving like 111.4 equally weighted positions to 40.4 — 64% fewer, while its top ten went from 22.22% to 42.58% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 1,243 positions in ESGV's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: listed with the point-in-time files, available on request.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of ESGV's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.06 percentage points over 81 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: ESGV.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-05-31, $7m was out to 11 borrowers, 0.06% of net assets. The largest, JP MORGAN SECURITIES LLC, held 38.6% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 0.06% of net assets, 107.1% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter ESGV has filed, with each borrower: ESGV.json · all funds.

1,256 positions became 1,235: 28 added (0.4% of the fund at the later date), 49 dropped (0.3% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 8.9%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of ESGV compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: Carnival Corp Ltd (0.06%), EchoStar Corp (0.03%), Planet Labs PBC (0.02%), Rocket Cos Inc (0.02%), Texas Roadhouse Inc (0.02%), Applied Digital Corp (0.02%). Gone: Carnival Corp (0.07%), Exact Sciences Corp (0.04%), REVOLUTION Medicines Inc (0.03%), Hologic Inc (0.03%), TKO Group Holdings Inc (0.03%), Confluent Inc (0.02%).

99.69% equity, 0.30% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $13.35B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Financing leg as filed: the fund pays OBFR01 + 0% on $22M of long swap notional . Issuers fill the spread field differently (some file the all-in rate), so compare within an issuer, not across.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of ESGV (40.4). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.