EQL holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), 10 issuer countries.

The largest line in EQL's filing is not a stock but Technology Select Sector Spdr Fund, a equity position at 6.11% of net assets. Ten companies are 44.59% of the fund; the other 499 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, EQL behaves like 40.7 holdings against a median of 42.4 — close to the median. Across 27 quarterly filings EQL has become less concentrated: it behaved like 11 at 2019-11-30 and 40.7 at 2026-05-31. Between the 2026-02-28 and 2026-05-31 filings 497 positions were added and 0 dropped; 51.8% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-11-30 and 2026-05-31, EQL went from behaving like 11 equally weighted positions to 40.7 — 270% more, while its top ten went from 91.48% to 44.59% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 509 positions in EQL's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: EQL.csv.gz.

Share of EQL's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of EQL's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.10 percentage points over 81 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: EQL.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-05-31, $38m was out to 10 borrowers, 2.78% of net assets. The largest, UBS AG, held 53% of it.

The filing reports no cash collateral position against this loan. Collateral taken in a form the fund does not hold as a position does not appear in N-PORT, so this is silence rather than absence. What the collateral figure can and cannot show. Every quarter EQL has filed, with each borrower: EQL.json · all funds.

12 positions became 509: 497 added (51.8% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 51.8%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of EQL compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: Alphabet Inc (2.91%), Amazon.com Inc (2.03%), Exxon Mobil Corp (1.27%), Nvidia Corp (1.16%), Apple Inc (1.07%), Linde Plc (1.04%).

99.98% equity, 0.02% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of EQL (40.7). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.