XLC holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

XLC's largest investment is Meta Platforms Inc at 19.9% of net assets. Alphabet Inc and Alphabet Inc follow; the three together are 43.4%. Ten companies are 76.18% of the fund; the other 16 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, XLC behaves like 11.2 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 3.8 times more concentrated than the median. Across 28 quarterly filings XLC has held roughly steady since 2019-09-30 (12.4 then, 11.2 now).

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, XLC went from behaving like 12.4 equally weighted positions to 11.2 — 10% fewer, while its top ten went from 72.73% to 76.18% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

Measured against every other fund on this site, from the same filings. Combined effective holdings is how the pair behaves held in equal size.

The 15 largest of 26 positions in XLC's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: XLC.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of XLC's own filings, 84 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.03 percentage points over 84 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: XLC.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-06-30, $382m was out to 14 borrowers, 1.71% of net assets. The largest, BNP PARIBAS SECURITIES CORP, held 25.4% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 0.83% of net assets, 48.4% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter XLC has filed, with each borrower: XLC.json · all funds.

24 positions became 24: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 7.3%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of XLC compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

99.09% equity, 0.91% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $22.26B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of XLC (11.2). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.

• XLC vs VOX: The Communication-Services Sector — Where Big Tech Hides in Plain Sight

  XLC and VOX both label themselves "communication services," but the sector is functionally a large-cap growth vehicle: Meta, Alphabet, and Netflix dominate...

  15 Aug 2026 9 min ETF Analysis