IHF holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

IHF's largest investment is Unitedhealth Group Inc at 21.91% of net assets. CVS Health Corp and Elevance Health Inc follow; the three together are 43.83%. Ten companies are 72.12% of the fund; the other 53 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, IHF behaves like 11.1 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 3.8 times more concentrated than the median. Across 28 quarterly filings IHF has held roughly steady since 2019-09-30 (10.7 then, 11.1 now). Between the 2026-03-31 and 2026-06-30 filings 2 positions were added and 0 dropped; 10.7% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, IHF went from behaving like 10.7 equally weighted positions to 11.1 — 4% more, while its top ten went from 74.8% to 72.12% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

IHF's filing lists 64 positions including 3.32% of net assets in securities-lending cash collateral. Counted as filed the fund reads 11 effective holdings with a top ten of 72.13%; on its own investments — the figure above — it reads 11.1 with a top ten of 72.12%. The collateral is matched by a liability and is not a holding the fund chose; since 2026-09-18 every figure on this site sets it aside (methodology). Both numbers are in the data.

The 15 largest of 63 positions in IHF's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: IHF.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of IHF's own filings, 84 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.07 percentage points over 84 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: IHF.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-06-30, $39m was out to 12 borrowers, 3.29% of net assets. The largest, BofA Securities, Inc., held 32.6% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 3.32% of net assets, 100.9% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter IHF has filed, with each borrower: IHF.json · all funds.

61 positions became 63: 2 added (0.2% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 10.7%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of IHF compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: AGILON HEALTH, INC. (0.20%), XAV HEALTH CARE SEP26 (0.00%).

96.70% equity, 3.29% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $1.18B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of IHF (11.1). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.