TMFC holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 99.21% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

TMFC's largest investment is Nvidia Corp at 9.4% of net assets. Alphabet Inc and Apple Inc follow; the three together are 26.34%. Ten companies are 55.19% of the fund; the other 92 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, TMFC behaves like 24.7 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 1.7 times more concentrated than the median. Across 25 quarterly filings TMFC has held roughly steady since 2020-05-31 (22.7 then, 24.7 now). Between the 2026-02-28 and 2026-05-31 filings 13 positions were added and 13 dropped; 15.7% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2020-05-31 and 2026-05-31, TMFC went from behaving like 22.7 equally weighted positions to 24.7 — 9% more, while its top ten went from 55.45% to 55.19% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 102 positions in TMFC's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: TMFC.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of TMFC's own filings, 75 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.09 percentage points over 75 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: TMFC.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-05-31, $17m was out to 5 borrowers, 0.79% of net assets. The largest, BMO Capital Markets, held 46% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 0.79% of net assets, 99.4% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter TMFC has filed, with each borrower: TMFC.json · all funds.

102 positions became 102: 13 added (4.6% of the fund at the later date), 13 dropped (2.4% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 15.7%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of TMFC compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: Intel Corp (2.24%), Constellation Energy Corp (0.41%), Coherent Corp (0.30%), Comfort Systems USA Inc (0.25%), AutoZone Inc (0.18%), Westinghouse Air Brake Technol (0.17%). Gone: 3M Co (0.44%), Digital Realty Trust Inc (0.30%), Ford Motor Co (0.28%), Carvana Co (0.23%), Copart Inc (0.18%), Fair Isaac Corp (0.17%).

99.13% equity, 0.87% short-term investment as filed; 99.2% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of TMFC (24.7). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.