NULG holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

NULG's largest investment is Nvidia Corp at 17.03% of net assets. Broadcom Inc and Alphabet Inc follow; the three together are 30.54%. Ten companies are 44.04% of the fund; the other 60 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, NULG behaves like 24.7 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 1.7 times more concentrated than the median. Across 27 quarterly filings NULG has become more concentrated: it behaved like 43.2 at 2019-10-31 and 19.9 at 2026-04-30. Between the 2026-01-31 and 2026-04-30 filings 7 positions were added and 10 dropped; 17.1% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-10-31 and 2026-04-30, NULG went from behaving like 43.2 equally weighted positions to 19.9 — 54% fewer, while its top ten went from 33.28% to 49.58% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 70 positions in NULG's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: NULG.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of NULG's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.06 percentage points over 81 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: NULG.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-07-31, $5m was out to 3 borrowers. The largest, BNP PARIBAS SECURITIES CORP, held 58.3% of it.

The filing reports no cash collateral position against this loan. Collateral taken in a form the fund does not hold as a position does not appear in N-PORT, so this is silence rather than absence. What the collateral figure can and cannot show. Every quarter NULG has filed, with each borrower: NULG.json · all funds.

68 positions became 65: 7 added (9.1% of the fund at the later date), 10 dropped (5.4% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 17.1%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of NULG compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: Alphabet Inc (5.95%), Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc (1.41%), Fair Isaac Corp (0.79%), First Solar Inc (0.44%), Datadog Inc (0.32%), Gartner Inc (0.12%). Gone: Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (1.41%), Electronic Arts Inc (0.81%), Take-Two Interactive Software Inc (0.59%), Atlassian Corp (0.54%), CBRE Group Inc (0.53%), Carvana Co (0.48%).

100.0% of NULG is carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's, from Form N-PORT; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $2.61B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of NULG (24.7). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.