Fund · Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF · measured from SEC filings
SCHP holdings
SCHP reports 49 holdings and behaves like 36.2 equally weighted ones, computed from its SEC Form N-PORT filing for 2026-06-30. The fact sheet publishes the first number; this page computes the second, and traces it across 28 quarters of filings.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-06-30Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 0% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.
What stands out
as of 2026-06-30SCHP's largest investment is U.S. Treasury Inflation-Indexed Notes at 4.07% of net assets. U.S. Treasury Inflation-Indexed Notes and U.S. Treasury Inflation-Indexed Notes follow; the three together are 12.08%. Ten companies are 36.43% of the fund; the other 39 share the rest. Among the 192 bond funds measured here, SCHP behaves like 36.2 holdings against a median of 236.4 — 6.7 times more concentrated than the median. Across 28 quarterly filings SCHP has held roughly steady since 2019-09-30 (34.9 then, 36.2 now). Between the 2026-03-31 and 2026-06-30 filings 1 positions were added and 1 dropped; 4.3% of the weight moved.
Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable bond funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.
Every filing since 2019
28Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, SCHP went from behaving like 34.9 equally weighted positions to 36.2 — 4% more, while its top ten went from 36.39% to 36.43% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | 49 | 36.2 | 36.43% | 4.09% |
| 2026-03-31 | 49 | 36.3 | 36.21% | 4.14% |
| 2025-12-31 | 49 | 36.8 | 36.01% | 4.16% |
| 2025-09-30 | 49 | 37.2 | 35.6% | 4.16% |
| 2025-06-30 | 49 | 37.1 | 35.68% | 4.19% |
| 2025-03-31 | 49 | 37.5 | 35.37% | 4.02% |
| 2024-12-31 | 49 | 38 | 34.8% | 3.97% |
| 2024-09-30 | 49 | 38.6 | 34.4% | 3.91% |
Earlier filings (20 more, back to 2019-09-30)
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-30 | 49 | 38.3 | 34.39% | 3.9% |
| 2024-03-31 | 49 | 38.6 | 34.19% | 3.69% |
| 2023-12-31 | 49 | 39.4 | 33.32% | 3.66% |
| 2023-09-30 | 49 | 39.2 | 33.18% | 3.65% |
| 2023-06-30 | 49 | 39.6 | 33.1% | 3.75% |
| 2023-03-31 | 49 | 39.8 | 33.07% | 3.79% |
| 2022-12-31 | 48 | 39.1 | 33.42% | 3.78% |
| 2022-09-30 | 47 | 38.1 | 34.27% | 3.98% |
| 2022-06-30 | 47 | 38.3 | 34.46% | 4.01% |
| 2022-03-31 | 47 | 39.4 | 33.41% | 3.79% |
| 2021-12-31 | 46 | 39.4 | 33.32% | 3.65% |
| 2021-09-30 | 45 | 38.3 | 34.25% | 3.8% |
| 2021-06-30 | 45 | 37.9 | 34.6% | 3.8% |
| 2021-03-31 | 45 | 37.6 | 34.97% | 3.86% |
| 2020-12-31 | 44 | 37.8 | 34.13% | 3.7% |
| 2020-09-30 | 43 | 36.9 | 35.23% | 3.77% |
| 2020-06-30 | 43 | 36.6 | 35.51% | 3.79% |
| 2020-03-31 | 43 | 37 | 34.49% | 3.55% |
| 2019-12-31 | 42 | 35.8 | 35.48% | 3.68% |
| 2019-09-30 | 41 | 34.9 | 36.39% | 3.78% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Compared with, in the essays
2Overlap with other funds
2Measured against every other fund on this site, from the same filings. Combined effective holdings is how the pair behaves held in equal size.
| With | Overlap | Shared | Combined effective |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCHP vs TIP | 89.66% | 45 | 38.6 |
| SCHP vs VTIP | 49.44% | 20 | 35.3 |
Largest positions, as filed
as of 2026-06-30The 15 largest of 49 positions in SCHP's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: SCHP.csv.gz.
| # | Position | Weight | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States Treasury | 4.09% | 4.1% |
| 2 | United States Treasury | 4.03% | 8.1% |
| 3 | United States Treasury | 4.02% | 12.1% |
| 4 | United States Treasury | 3.79% | 15.9% |
| 5 | United States Treasury | 3.62% | 19.5% |
| 6 | United States Treasury | 3.42% | 23.0% |
| 7 | United States Treasury | 3.39% | 26.4% |
| 8 | United States Treasury | 3.38% | 29.7% |
| 9 | United States Treasury | 3.35% | 33.1% |
| 10 | United States Treasury | 3.35% | 36.4% |
| 11 | United States Treasury | 3.29% | 39.7% |
| 12 | United States Treasury | 3.17% | 42.9% |
| 13 | United States Treasury | 3.15% | 46.0% |
| 14 | United States Treasury | 3.15% | 49.2% |
| 15 | United States Treasury | 3.06% | 52.2% |
Returns the fund reported
2019-07 – 2026-06Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of SCHP's own filings, 84 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.
Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.05 percentage points over 84 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: SCHP.json · all funds.
Who borrows SCHP's shares
2020-03-31The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2020-03-31, $52m was out to 1 borrower, 0.61% of net assets.
| Borrower | On loan | Share of the loan |
|---|---|---|
| JP MORGAN SECURITIES LLC | $52m | 100.0% |
Cash collateral reported against the loan: 0.61% of net assets, 100.5% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter SCHP has filed, with each borrower: SCHP.json · all funds.
Since the previous filing
2026-03-31 → 2026-06-3049 positions became 49: 1 added (1.8% of the fund at the later date), 1 dropped (3.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 4.3%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of SCHP compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.
| Largest increases | 2026-03-31 | 2026-06-30 | Largest decreases | 2026-03-31 | 2026-06-30 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States Treasury | 1.45% | 4.02% | United States Treasury | 3.22% | 3.15% |
| United States Treasury | 0.70% | 0.71% | United States Treasury | 2.87% | 2.81% |
| United States Treasury | 0.60% | 0.60% | United States Treasury | 3.23% | 3.17% |
| United States Treasury | 0.65% | 0.65% | United States Treasury | 3.45% | 3.39% |
| United States Treasury | 3.35% | 3.29% | |||
| United States Treasury | 3.47% | 3.42% |
New: United States Treasury (1.76%). Gone: United States Treasury (3.03%).
Asset categories and pricing
as of 2026-06-30100.00% debt as filed; 0.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.
Neighbours by effective holdings, debt funds
10Every measured debt fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of SCHP (36.2). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.
| Fund | Reports | Behaves like | Top ten | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOVI Invesco Equal Weight 0-30 Year Treasury ETF | 31 | 30 | 33.82% | 2026-05-31 |
| IBTJ iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF | 35 | 30.7 | 40.15% | 2026-07-31 |
| TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 47 | 31.3 | 42.23% | 2026-05-31 |
| FSTB Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund | 463 | 33.1 | 44.65% | 2026-05-31 |
| APCB ActivePassive Core Bond ETF | 1,843 | 33.8 | 32.97% | 2026-05-31 |
| TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | 49 | 36.3 | 35.76% | 2026-07-31 |
| TLH iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 67 | 37.2 | 37.79% | 2026-05-31 |
| IBTI iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Treasury ETF | 46 | 42.3 | 26.99% | 2026-07-31 |
| XTEN BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 70 | 45.7 | 34.06% | 2026-07-31 |
| IBTH iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF | 52 | 45.9 | 27.43% | 2026-07-31 |
Essays that examine SCHP
1-
TIP vs SCHP vs VTIP: How Inflation-Protected Bond ETFs Differ by Duration
TIP and SCHP hold the full-maturity TIPS ladder and behave almost identically; the only durable difference between them is a 0.15% fee gap that favors SCHP....
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.