IBTH holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 0.3% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

IBTH's largest investment is U.S. Treasury Notes at 2.9% of net assets. U.S. Treasury Notes and U.S. Treasury Notes follow; the three together are 8.37%. Ten companies are 27.43% of the fund; the other 42 share the rest. Among the 192 bond funds measured here, IBTH behaves like 45.9 holdings against a median of 236.4 — 5.3 times more concentrated than the median. Across 25 quarterly filings IBTH has become less concentrated: it behaved like 3.7 at 2020-04-30 and 45.9 at 2026-04-30.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable bond funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2020-04-30 and 2026-04-30, IBTH went from behaving like 3.7 equally weighted positions to 45.9 — 1141% more, while its top ten went from 100% to 27.33% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 52 positions in IBTH's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: IBTH.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of IBTH's own filings, 75 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.04 percentage points over 74 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: IBTH.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-04-30, $48m was out to 1 borrower, 2.22% of net assets.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 2.27% of net assets, 102.2% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter IBTH has filed, with each borrower: IBTH.json · all funds.

52 positions became 52: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 0.2%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of IBTH compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

99.70% debt, 0.30% short-term investment as filed; 0.3% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured debt fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of IBTH (45.9). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.