HNDL holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 98.58% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

The largest line in HNDL's filing is not a stock but Schwab U S Aggregate Bond ETF, a fund position at 10.99% of net assets. Ten companies are 78.01% of the fund; the other 11 share the rest. Among the 12 unknown funds measured here, HNDL behaves like 13.7 holdings against a median of 3.2 — 4.2 times the median. Across 25 quarterly filings HNDL has held roughly steady since 2020-04-30 (13.8 then, 14.1 now). Between the 2026-01-31 and 2026-04-30 filings 1 positions were added and 2 dropped; 2.4% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable unknown funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2023-10-31 and 2026-04-30, HNDL went from behaving like 13.8 equally weighted positions to 14.1 — 2% more, while its top ten went from 77.26% to 77.47% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 21 positions in HNDL's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: HNDL.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of HNDL's own filings, 75 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: HNDL.json · all funds.

24 positions became 23: 1 added (0.2% of the fund at the later date), 2 dropped (0.3% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 2.4%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of HNDL compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: HNDL TRS N7HNDLT EQ (0.18%). Gone: United States of America (0.24%), HNDL TRS N7HNDLT EQ (0.06%).

98.58% unknown, 1.42% debt as filed; 98.6% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $645M. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Financing leg as filed: the fund pays FELD01 + 0.98% on $0M of long swap notional . Issuers fill the spread field differently (some file the all-in rate), so compare within an issuer, not across.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured unknown fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of HNDL (13.7). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.