BYLD holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

The largest line in BYLD's filing is not a stock but Ishares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF, a fund position at 20.11% of net assets. Ten companies are 94.84% of the fund; the other 3 share the rest. Among the 12 unknown funds measured here, BYLD behaves like 9.4 holdings against a median of 3.2 — 2.9 times the median. Across 27 quarterly filings BYLD has become less concentrated: it behaved like 6 at 2019-10-31 and 8.9 at 2026-04-30.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable unknown funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-10-31 and 2026-04-30, BYLD went from behaving like 6 equally weighted positions to 8.9 — 48% more, while its top ten went from 100% to 97.9% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

BYLD's filing lists 14 positions including 30.08% of net assets in securities-lending cash collateral. Counted as filed the fund reads 5.1 effective holdings with a top ten of 120.75%; on its own investments — the figure above — it reads 9.4 with a top ten of 94.84%. The collateral is matched by a liability and is not a holding the fund chose; since 2026-09-18 every figure on this site sets it aside (methodology). Both numbers are in the data.

The 12 largest of 13 positions in BYLD's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: BYLD.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of BYLD's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: BYLD.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-07-31, $132m was out to 5 borrowers. The largest, CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC., held 36.7% of it.

The filing reports no cash collateral position against this loan. Collateral taken in a form the fund does not hold as a position does not appear in N-PORT, so this is silence rather than absence. What the collateral figure can and cannot show. Every quarter BYLD has filed, with each borrower: BYLD.json · all funds.

12 positions became 12: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 0.3%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of BYLD compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

76.81% unknown, 23.19% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured unknown fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of BYLD (9.4). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.