GSSC holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 99.99% at a quoted market price (level 1), 16 issuer countries.

The largest line in GSSC's filing is not a stock but Goldman Sachs Financial Square Treasury Obligations Fund, a short-term position at 1.45% of net assets. Ten companies are 6.56% of the fund; the other 1,310 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, GSSC behaves like 610.4 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 14.4 times the median. Across 27 quarterly filings GSSC has become more concentrated: it behaved like 905 at 2019-11-29 and 610.4 at 2026-05-31. Between the 2026-02-28 and 2026-05-31 filings 66 positions were added and 72 dropped; 14.1% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-11-29 and 2026-05-31, GSSC went from behaving like 905 equally weighted positions to 610.4 — 33% fewer, while its top ten went from 3.06% to 6.56% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

GSSC's filing lists 1,321 positions including 1.22% of net assets in securities-lending cash collateral. Counted as filed the fund reads 560.2 effective holdings with a top ten of 7.4%; on its own investments — the figure above — it reads 610.4 with a top ten of 6.56%. The collateral is matched by a liability and is not a holding the fund chose; since 2026-09-18 every figure on this site sets it aside (methodology). Both numbers are in the data.

The 15 largest of 1,320 positions in GSSC's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: listed with the point-in-time files, available on request.

Share of GSSC's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of GSSC's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: GSSC.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-05-31, $12m was out to 15 borrowers, 1.17% of net assets. The largest, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, held 37.1% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 1.22% of net assets, 104.1% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter GSSC has filed, with each borrower: GSSC.json · all funds.

1,326 positions became 1,320: 66 added (2.1% of the fund at the later date), 72 dropped (2.5% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 14.1%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of GSSC compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: PIPER SANDLER COMPANIES (0.15%), MAXLINEAR INC (0.11%), CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE (0.10%), COURSERA INC (0.07%), FORMFACTOR INC (0.06%), AEHR TEST SYSTEMS INC (0.05%). Gone: Amicus Therapeutics Inc. (0.19%), Piper Sandler Companies (0.15%), CSG Systems International Inc. (0.14%), Avidity Biosciences Inc. (0.12%), Tri Pointe Homes Inc (0.11%), Enhabit Inc (0.11%).

100.0% of GSSC is carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1); 0.0% at level 3, priced from the filer's own inputs. Categories and levels are the filer's, from Form N-PORT; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $986M. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of GSSC (610.4). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.