Fund index
FCTR
6 articles on this site analyse FCTR — 3 of them head-on.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-06-30FCTR reports 166 positions, but the weights make it behave like about 113.9 equally weighted ones. Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing — see what this measure does not tell you and the full table.
The same filing says what kind of price those positions carry: 100% of FCTR is held at a quoted market price, across 7 issuer countries . Comparisons across every fund are in the valuation table, and what a low share does and does not mean is worth reading before drawing a conclusion from it.
Every filing since 2019
28Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, FCTR went from behaving like 109.8 equally weighted positions to 113.9 — 4% more, while its top ten went from 18.52% to 18.11% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | 166 | 113.9 | 18.11% | 3.2% |
| 2026-03-31 | 173 | 131.5 | 15.06% | 2.02% |
| 2025-12-31 | 160 | 106.2 | 18.52% | 3.06% |
| 2025-09-30 | 163 | 88.9 | 19.91% | 6.05% |
| 2025-06-30 | 165 | 120.8 | 16.85% | 2.75% |
| 2025-03-31 | 167 | 107 | 18.76% | 3.48% |
| 2024-12-31 | 179 | 119.4 | 17.47% | 3.97% |
| 2024-09-30 | 158 | 117.8 | 16.16% | 2.14% |
| 2024-06-30 | 171 | 133.6 | 14.44% | 2.06% |
| 2024-03-31 | 160 | 95.8 | 21.57% | 4.3% |
| 2023-12-31 | 155 | 105.6 | 18.28% | 2.66% |
| 2023-09-29 | 163 | 122 | 16.96% | 2.34% |
| 2023-06-30 | 148 | 95.1 | 20.26% | 3.97% |
| 2023-03-31 | 155 | 103.4 | 18.81% | 3.85% |
| 2022-12-30 | 173 | 114.9 | 17.48% | 2.25% |
| 2022-09-30 | 171 | 110.7 | 19.09% | 2.96% |
| 2022-06-30 | 177 | 133.1 | 15.35% | 1.93% |
| 2022-03-31 | 163 | 109.4 | 18.91% | 2.67% |
| 2021-12-31 | 160 | 120.7 | 15.47% | 1.77% |
| 2021-09-30 | 172 | 129.6 | 15.15% | 2.53% |
| 2021-06-30 | 171 | 105.3 | 19.67% | 2.5% |
| 2021-03-31 | 154 | 100.9 | 20.23% | 2.98% |
| 2020-12-31 | 154 | 78.7 | 23.33% | 6.03% |
| 2020-09-30 | 170 | 98.2 | 21.42% | 3.41% |
| 2020-06-30 | 170 | 105.6 | 19.74% | 2.91% |
| 2020-03-31 | 169 | 107.5 | 19.32% | 3.42% |
| 2019-12-31 | 178 | 142.3 | 12.83% | 1.88% |
| 2019-09-30 | 154 | 109.8 | 18.52% | 2.06% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Most often compared against
2Measures applied to it
7All articles
6-
CALF vs AVUV: Small-Cap Free Cash Flow vs Small-Cap Value — Two Quality Screens
Both funds screen small-caps for "quality," but on different variables: CALF ranks by free-cash-flow yield, AVUV by valuation crossed with profitability....
-
OMFL vs FCTR: Dynamic Multi-Factor — Rules-Based Rotation vs AI Optimization
Both funds rotate factor exposure by rule, not by forecast — but OMFL blends several factors against a macro-regime signal while FCTR makes a near-binary...
-
BOTZ vs. ROBO vs. AIQ: Three AI & Robotics ETFs Compared
The three funds share a marketing category but not a portfolio: AIQ's 5-year CAGR of 17.2% comes mostly from mega-cap semiconductors and hyperscalers, not...
-
12 Months of Live AI-Quant ETFs vs the S&P 500 — Honest Data Review
Across the full live track record (5Y through May 2026), none of the five AI-quant or rules-based factor ETFs in this review beat SPY's 13.8% CAGR. The...
-
FCTR vs LRGF: Where AI Actually Changes the Multi-Factor Loading
LRGF has returned 13.5% annualized over the past five years; FCTR has returned 3.0%. A 10.5-percentage-point gap that wide is structural, not noise. FCTR's...
-
COWZ vs. FCTR: Free Cash Flow Focus vs. AI Multi-Factor Optimization
Over the trailing five years, COWZ compounded at 10.6% per year while FCTR managed 2.9%, with a deeper drawdown — the simpler rule beat the adaptive model...
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.