Fund · First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF · measured from SEC filings
FCTR holdings
FCTR reports 166 holdings and behaves like 113.9 equally weighted ones, computed from its SEC Form N-PORT filing for 2026-06-30. The fact sheet publishes the first number; this page computes the second, and traces it across 28 quarters of filings.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-06-30Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table . Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), 7 issuer countries.
What stands out
as of 2026-06-30Ten companies are 18.11% of the fund; the other 156 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, FCTR behaves like 113.9 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 2.7 times the median. Across 28 quarterly filings FCTR has held roughly steady since 2019-09-30 (109.6 then, 113.9 now). Between the 2026-03-31 and 2026-06-30 filings 84 positions were added and 91 dropped; 64.2% of the weight moved.
Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.
Every filing since 2019
28Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, FCTR went from behaving like 109.6 equally weighted positions to 113.9 — 4% more, while its top ten went from 18.53% to 18.11% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | 166 | 113.9 | 18.11% | 3.2% |
| 2026-03-31 | 173 | 131.4 | 15.06% | 2.02% |
| 2025-12-31 | 160 | 106.2 | 18.51% | 3.06% |
| 2025-09-30 | 163 | 88.9 | 19.91% | 6.05% |
| 2025-06-30 | 165 | 120.8 | 16.86% | 2.75% |
| 2025-03-31 | 167 | 107 | 18.76% | 3.48% |
| 2024-12-31 | 179 | 119.4 | 17.47% | 3.97% |
| 2024-09-30 | 158 | 117.7 | 16.17% | 2.14% |
Earlier filings (20 more, back to 2019-09-30)
| Period | Holdings | Effective | Top 10 | Largest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-30 | 171 | 133.5 | 14.44% | 2.06% |
| 2024-03-31 | 160 | 95.7 | 21.58% | 4.3% |
| 2023-12-31 | 155 | 105.6 | 18.28% | 2.66% |
| 2023-09-29 | 163 | 121.9 | 16.96% | 2.34% |
| 2023-06-30 | 148 | 95 | 20.27% | 3.97% |
| 2023-03-31 | 155 | 103.4 | 18.82% | 3.85% |
| 2022-12-30 | 173 | 114.8 | 17.49% | 2.26% |
| 2022-09-30 | 171 | 110.7 | 19.09% | 2.96% |
| 2022-06-30 | 177 | 133 | 15.36% | 1.93% |
| 2022-03-31 | 163 | 109.4 | 18.91% | 2.67% |
| 2021-12-31 | 160 | 120.8 | 15.47% | 1.77% |
| 2021-09-30 | 172 | 129.6 | 15.15% | 2.53% |
| 2021-06-30 | 171 | 105.2 | 19.68% | 2.5% |
| 2021-03-31 | 154 | 100.9 | 20.23% | 2.98% |
| 2020-12-31 | 154 | 78.8 | 23.32% | 6.02% |
| 2020-09-30 | 170 | 98.2 | 21.42% | 3.41% |
| 2020-06-30 | 170 | 105.5 | 19.75% | 2.91% |
| 2020-03-31 | 169 | 107.4 | 19.33% | 3.43% |
| 2019-12-31 | 178 | 142 | 12.85% | 1.88% |
| 2019-09-30 | 154 | 109.6 | 18.53% | 2.06% |
One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.
Compared with, in the essays
2By country of issuer
as of 2026-06-30Share of FCTR's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.
| Country | Share |
|---|---|
| United States | 91.66% |
| Ireland° | 3.15% |
| Cayman Islands° | 1.98% |
| Netherlands° | 1.01% |
| Switzerland | 0.98% |
| Bermuda° | 0.83% |
| Liberia° | 0.38% |
Returns the fund reported
2019-07 – 2026-06Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of FCTR's own filings, 84 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.
Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: FCTR.json · all funds.
Since the previous filing
2026-03-31 → 2026-06-30173 positions became 166: 84 added (50.7% of the fund at the later date), 91 dropped (48.1% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 64.2%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of FCTR compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.
| Largest increases | 2026-03-31 | 2026-06-30 | Largest decreases | 2026-03-31 | 2026-06-30 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUMANA INC | 0.39% | 2.24% | DOW INC | 2.02% | 0.59% |
| FAIR ISAAC CORP | 0.27% | 1.36% | TARGET CORP | 1.61% | 0.50% |
| INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY | 0.14% | 1.20% | COMCAST CORP | 1.44% | 0.60% |
| ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORP | 0.27% | 1.25% | VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC | 1.04% | 0.27% |
| ROBLOX CORP | 0.19% | 0.95% | HALLIBURTON COMPANY | 0.86% | 0.18% |
| FISERV INC | 0.36% | 1.04% | LOEWS CORP | 1.13% | 0.46% |
New: CENTENE CORP (3.20%), AXON ENTERPRISE INC (2.05%), BLOOM ENERGY CORP (1.84%), SUPER MICRO COMPUTER INC (1.77%), CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING LTD (1.53%), FLUTTER ENTERTAINMENT PLC (1.33%). Gone: Warner Bros. Discovery Inc. (1.80%), Constellation Brands, Inc. (1.12%), KeyCorp (0.97%), EQT Corporation (0.94%), Boeing Co. (0.88%), FactSet Research Systems Inc. (0.84%).
Asset categories and pricing
as of 2026-06-3099.94% equity, 0.06% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.
Neighbours by effective holdings, equity funds
10Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of FCTR (113.9). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.
| Fund | Reports | Behaves like | Top ten | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 119 | 107.7 | 15.15% | 2026-07-31 |
| AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 195 | 109.9 | 16.76% | 2026-05-31 |
| XBI State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Biotech ETF | 158 | 110.2 | 13.32% | 2026-06-30 |
| USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 168 | 110.5 | 15.14% | 2026-07-31 |
| DTD WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund | 823 | 113.4 | 21.04% | 2026-06-30 |
| DBEU Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity ETF | 429 | 114.1 | 20.52% | 2026-05-29 |
| ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 2,268 | 114.3 | 24.13% | 2026-07-31 |
| FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF | 735 | 114.6 | 22.45% | 2026-05-31 |
| EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 337 | 115.8 | 20.02% | 2026-05-31 |
| VNQI Vanguard Global Ex-U.s. Real Estate Index Fund | 729 | 117.1 | 22.17% | 2026-07-31 |
Measures applied in the essays
7Essays that examine FCTR
6-
CALF vs AVUV: Small-Cap Free Cash Flow vs Small-Cap Value — Two Quality Screens
Both funds screen small-caps for "quality," but on different variables: CALF ranks by free-cash-flow yield, AVUV by valuation crossed with profitability....
-
OMFL vs FCTR: Dynamic Multi-Factor — Rules-Based Rotation vs AI Optimization
Both funds rotate factor exposure by rule, not by forecast — but OMFL blends several factors against a macro-regime signal while FCTR makes a near-binary...
-
BOTZ vs. ROBO vs. AIQ: Three AI & Robotics ETFs Compared
The three funds share a marketing category but not a portfolio: AIQ's 5-year CAGR of 17.2% comes mostly from mega-cap semiconductors and hyperscalers, not...
-
12 Months of Live AI-Quant ETFs vs the S&P 500 — Honest Data Review
Across the full live track record (5Y through May 2026), none of the five AI-quant or rules-based factor ETFs in this review beat SPY's 13.8% CAGR. The...
-
FCTR vs LRGF: Where AI Actually Changes the Multi-Factor Loading
LRGF has returned 13.5% annualized over the past five years; FCTR has returned 3.0%. A 10.5-percentage-point gap that wide is structural, not noise. FCTR's...
-
COWZ vs. FCTR: Free Cash Flow Focus vs. AI Multi-Factor Optimization
Over the trailing five years, COWZ compounded at 10.6% per year while FCTR managed 2.9%, with a deeper drawdown — the simpler rule beat the adaptive model...
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.