BBCA holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), 2 issuer countries, 0.42% restricted securities.

BBCA's largest investment is Royal Bank Of Canada at 8.39% of net assets. Toronto-Dominion Bank (the) and Shopify Inc follow; the three together are 19.34%. Ten companies are 44.4% of the fund; the other 69 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, BBCA behaves like 32 holdings against a median of 42.4 — close to the median. Across 27 quarterly filings BBCA has held roughly steady since 2019-10-31 (34.8 then, 34.8 now). Between the 2026-01-31 and 2026-04-30 filings 1 positions were added and 0 dropped; 4.8% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-10-31 and 2026-04-30, BBCA went from behaving like 34.8 equally weighted positions to 34.8 — 0% more, while its top ten went from 44.31% to 42.78% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

BBCA's filing lists 80 positions including 4.04% of net assets in securities-lending cash collateral. Counted as filed the fund reads 30.5 effective holdings with a top ten of 45.81%; on its own investments — the figure above — it reads 32 with a top ten of 44.4%. The collateral is matched by a liability and is not a holding the fund chose; since 2026-09-18 every figure on this site sets it aside (methodology). Both numbers are in the data.

The 15 largest of 79 positions in BBCA's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: BBCA.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of BBCA's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.09 percentage points over 81 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: BBCA.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-07-31, $418m was out to 9 borrowers. The largest, CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC., held 25.6% of it.

The filing reports no cash collateral position against this loan. Collateral taken in a form the fund does not hold as a position does not appear in N-PORT, so this is silence rather than absence. What the collateral figure can and cannot show. Every quarter BBCA has filed, with each borrower: BBCA.json · all funds.

77 positions became 78: 1 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 4.8%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of BBCA compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: N/A (0.03%).

95.45% equity, 4.54% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $10.71B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of BBCA (32). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.