QYLD holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

QYLD's largest investment is Nvidia Corp at 8.85% of net assets. Apple Inc and Microsoft Corp follow; the three together are 21.64%. Ten companies are 46.44% of the fund; the other 93 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, QYLD behaves like 32.8 holdings against a median of 42.4 — close to the median. Across 27 quarterly filings QYLD has become less concentrated: it behaved like 21.4 at 2019-10-31 and 32.2 at 2026-04-30. Between the 2026-01-31 and 2026-04-30 filings 1 positions were added and 1 dropped; 6.4% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-10-31 and 2026-04-30, QYLD went from behaving like 21.4 equally weighted positions to 32.2 — 50% more, while its top ten went from 55.3% to 46.75% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

Measured against every other fund on this site, from the same filings. Combined effective holdings is how the pair behaves held in equal size.

The 15 largest of 103 positions in QYLD's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: QYLD.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of QYLD's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

No compounded figure is shown. This site's two readings of QYLD's monthly returns — the filed figures and a series computed from prices — differ by a median of 1.14 percentage points over 81 months, more than distributions explain. Which is wrong cannot be told from the filings; the others in the same position are listed here.

101 positions became 101: 1 added (0.8% of the fund at the later date), 1 dropped (0.1% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 6.4%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of QYLD compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: SANDISK CORPORATION (0.79%). Gone: ATLASSIAN CORPORATION (0.11%).

100.00% equity as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $8.33B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of QYLD (32.8). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.

• QYLD vs JEPI vs DIVO: Three Covered-Call Mechanics and the Return-of-Capital Question

  The three funds sell options in structurally different ways, and over the trailing five years the highest-yielding fund (QYLD, 5.9%) delivered the lowest...

  31 Jul 2026 10 min ETF Analysis

• AGG vs. BNDI: Total Bond Market vs. AI-Driven Active Fixed Income Strategy

  AGG and BNDI hold roughly the same investment-grade bond universe in their core. The difference is one decision: BNDI writes options on top of that core to...

  09 May 2026 10 min ETF Analysis