XTL holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), 2 issuer countries.

XTL's largest investment is Viasat Inc at 4.41% of net assets. Iridium Communications Inc and Extreme Networks Inc follow; the three together are 11.47%. Ten companies are 34.05% of the fund; the other 32 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, XTL behaves like 35.2 holdings against a median of 42.4 — close to the median. Across 28 quarterly filings XTL has held roughly steady since 2019-09-30 (35.5 then, 35.2 now).

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, XTL went from behaving like 35.5 equally weighted positions to 35.2 — 1% fewer, while its top ten went from 32.49% to 34.05% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

XTL's filing lists 43 positions including 3% of net assets in securities-lending cash collateral. Counted as filed the fund reads 34.1 effective holdings with a top ten of 34.06%; on its own investments — the figure above — it reads 35.2 with a top ten of 34.05%. The collateral is matched by a liability and is not a holding the fund chose; since 2026-09-18 every figure on this site sets it aside (methodology). Both numbers are in the data.

The 15 largest of 42 positions in XTL's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: XTL.csv.gz.

Share of XTL's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of XTL's own filings, 84 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: XTL.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-06-30, $79m was out to 16 borrowers, 11.10% of net assets. The largest, BARCLAYS BANK PLC, held 62.3% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 3.00% of net assets, 27% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter XTL has filed, with each borrower: XTL.json · all funds.

41 positions became 41: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 9.7%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of XTL compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

97.00% equity, 3.00% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of XTL (35.2). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.