XLSR holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

The largest line in XLSR's filing is not a stock but State Street Technology Select Sector Spdr ETF, a equity position at 27.81% of net assets. Ten companies are 88.52% of the fund; the other 19 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, XLSR behaves like 7.2 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 5.9 times more concentrated than the median. Across 28 quarterly filings XLSR has become less concentrated: it behaved like 4.8 at 2019-09-30 and 7.2 at 2026-06-30. Between the 2026-03-31 and 2026-06-30 filings 7 positions were added and 2 dropped; 27.2% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, XLSR went from behaving like 4.8 equally weighted positions to 7.2 — 50% more, while its top ten went from 100% to 88.52% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

XLSR's filing lists 30 positions including 27.91% of net assets in securities-lending cash collateral. Counted as filed the fund reads 4.6 effective holdings with a top ten of 112.4%; on its own investments — the figure above — it reads 7.2 with a top ten of 88.52%. The collateral is matched by a liability and is not a holding the fund chose; since 2026-09-18 every figure on this site sets it aside (methodology). Both numbers are in the data.

The 15 largest of 29 positions in XLSR's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: XLSR.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of XLSR's own filings, 84 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.09 percentage points over 84 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: XLSR.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-06-30, $282m was out to 9 borrowers, 28.23% of net assets. The largest, MORGAN STANLEY & CO LLC, held 71.1% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 27.91% of net assets, 98.9% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter XLSR has filed, with each borrower: XLSR.json · all funds.

21 positions became 26: 7 added (5.1% of the fund at the later date), 2 dropped (23.2% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 27.2%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of XLSR compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF (4.14%), Amazon.com Inc (0.66%), Costco Wholesale Corp (0.08%), T-Mobile US Inc (0.07%), Warner Bros Discovery Inc (0.06%), Comcast Corp (0.06%). Gone: State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (16.66%), State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (6.54%).

78.02% equity, 21.98% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of XLSR (7.2). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.