257 essays 1,087 funds measured independent · not paid by any fund or issuer we cover

Fund · Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF · measured from SEC filings

VRP holdings

VRP reports 344 holdings and behaves like 230 equally weighted ones, computed from its SEC Form N-PORT filing for 2026-05-31. The fact sheet publishes the first number; this page computes the second, and traces it across 27 quarters of filings.

Measured concentration

as of 2026-05-31

Read this figure with the following in mind

5.9% of net assets is securities-lending cash collateral, excluded from the figure; counted as filed the fund would read 160.7

The figure below is what the filing says, published unchanged. What it may not do is sit beside a plain long-only fund and be read as the same quantity. How comparability is decided.

344 Positions reported
230 Effective holdings
1.5× Concentration multiple
9.69% Top ten weight

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 12.17% at a quoted market price (level 1), 8 issuer countries.

What stands out

as of 2026-05-31

VRP's largest investment is Bank Of America Corp at 1.12% of net assets. JPMorgan Chase & Co., Series OO and Citigroup Inc., Series GG follow; the three together are 3.21%. Ten companies are 9.69% of the fund; the other 334 share the rest. Among the 192 bond funds measured here, VRP behaves like 230 holdings against a median of 236.4 — close to the median. Across 27 quarterly filings VRP has become less concentrated: it behaved like 134.1 at 2019-11-30 and 230 at 2026-05-31. Between the 2026-02-28 and 2026-05-31 filings 20 positions were added and 7 dropped; 6.4% of the weight moved. the United States is the largest country at 85.22% of the portfolio, across 8 countries in the filing.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable bond funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Every filing since 2019

27

Between 2019-11-30 and 2026-05-31, VRP went from behaving like 134.1 equally weighted positions to 230 — 72% more, while its top ten went from 15.2% to 9.69% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

PeriodHoldingsEffective Top 10Largest
2026-05-31 344 230 9.69% 1.14%
2026-02-28 331 215.8 10.56% 1.33%
2025-11-30 328 211.9 10.67% 1.35%
2025-08-31 314 202.7 10.97% 1.4%
2025-05-31 315 197.9 11.5% 1.64%
2025-02-28 314 201 10.98% 1.47%
2024-11-30 305 194.7 11.35% 1.51%
2024-08-31 306 191.7 11.6% 1.51%
Earlier filings (19 more, back to 2019-11-30)
PeriodHoldingsEffectiveTop 10Largest
2024-05-31 305 182.3 12.57% 2.09%
2024-02-29 303 188.5 11.56% 1.54%
2023-11-30 303 185.3 11.74% 1.56%
2023-08-31 309 187.9 11.83% 1.5%
2023-05-31 321 193.7 11.39% 1.44%
2023-02-28 322 186.4 12.19% 2.46%
2022-11-30 323 185.9 12.3% 2.48%
2022-08-31 317 185.6 12.32% 2.35%
2022-05-31 313 184.2 12.39% 2.26%
2022-02-28 311 181.3 12.41% 2.27%
2021-11-30 310 184.1 12.19% 2.23%
2021-08-31 302 178 12.58% 2.24%
2021-05-31 277 158 13.66% 2.45%
2021-02-28 271 154.8 14.06% 2.49%
2020-11-30 271 155.7 13.84% 2.32%
2020-08-31 264 152.2 13.85% 2.14%
2020-05-31 246 141.2 14.7% 2.41%
2020-02-29 243 139.4 14.99% 2.89%
2019-11-30 233 134.1 15.2% 2.97%

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

As filed, collateral included

5.86% collateral

VRP's filing lists 346 positions including 5.86% of net assets in securities-lending cash collateral. Counted as filed the fund reads 160.7 effective holdings with a top ten of 13.64%; on its own investments — the figure above — it reads 230 with a top ten of 9.69%. The collateral is matched by a liability and is not a holding the fund chose; since 2026-09-18 every figure on this site sets it aside (methodology). Both numbers are in the data.

Largest positions, as filed

as of 2026-05-31

The 15 largest of 344 positions in VRP's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: VRP.csv.gz.

#PositionWeightCumulative
1Bank of America Corp.1.14%1.1%
2JPMorgan Chase & Co.1.13%2.3%
3Citigroup Inc.1.01%3.3%
4JPMorgan Chase & Co.0.96%4.2%
5Citigroup Capital XIII0.94%5.2%
6Citigroup Inc.0.93%6.1%
7Bank of America Corp.0.93%7.1%
8BP Capital Markets PLC0.91%8.0%
9Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The)0.87%8.8%
10CVS Health Corp.0.86%9.7%
11Bank of America Corp.0.85%10.5%
12Wells Fargo & Co.0.83%11.4%
13JPMorgan Chase & Co.0.78%12.2%
14Charles Schwab Corp. (The)0.77%12.9%
15Wells Fargo & Co.0.76%13.7%

By country of issuer

as of 2026-05-31

Share of VRP's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

CountryShare
United States 84.33%
Canada 10.90%
United Kingdom 3.26%
Bermuda° 0.69%
Ireland° 0.48%
Jersey° 0.19%
Marshall Islands° 0.11%
Cayman Islands° 0.04%

Returns the fund reported

2019-09 – 2026-05

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of VRP's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

7.4%Last twelve months filed
39%Whole series, compounded
8.5%Best month
-13.9%Worst month

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.20 percentage points over 81 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: VRP.json · all funds.

Who borrows VRP's shares

2026-05-31

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-05-31, $164m was out to 28 borrowers, 5.66% of net assets. The largest, BARCLAYS BANK PLC, held 19.3% of it.

BorrowerOn loanShare of the loan
BARCLAYS BANK PLC $32m 19.3%
MORGAN STANLEY & CO LLC $22m 13.7%
CIBC World Markets Corporation $15m 9.2%
Wells Fargo Securities LLC $10m 6.3%
BNP Paribas $9m 5.3%

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 5.86% of net assets, 103.6% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter VRP has filed, with each borrower: VRP.json · all funds.

Since the previous filing

2026-02-28 → 2026-05-31

331 positions became 344: 20 added (6.0% of the fund at the later date), 7 dropped (2.9% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 6.4%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of VRP compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

Largest increases2026-02-282026-05-31Largest decreases2026-02-282026-05-31
MetLife, Inc.0.21%0.36% Charles Schwab Corp. (The)0.78%0.70%
Eversource Energy0.21%0.27% Citigroup Capital XIII1.01%0.94%
FMC Corp.0.18%0.21% JPMorgan Chase & Co.1.18%1.13%
Paramount Global0.30%0.31% Emera Inc.0.46%0.41%
Compass Diversified Holdings0.06%0.06% Citigroup Inc.0.42%0.37%
NGL Energy Partners L.P.0.12%0.12% JPMorgan Chase & Co.1.00%0.96%

New: Wells Fargo & Co. (0.83%), JPMorgan Chase & Co. (0.78%), Charles Schwab Corp. (The) (0.55%), Southern Co. (The) (0.48%), PacifiCorp (0.41%), Humana Inc. (0.36%). Gone: Wells Fargo & Co. (1.33%), Ally Financial Inc. (0.51%), Bank of America Corp. (0.38%), Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) (0.26%), Edison International (0.16%), National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corp. (0.13%).

Asset categories and pricing

as of 2026-05-31
Asset category (as filed)Share of investments
debt DBT82.19%
preferred equity EP12.16%
short-term investment STIV5.65%

12.2% of VRP is carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's, from Form N-PORT; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Neighbours by effective holdings, debt funds

10

Every measured debt fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of VRP (230). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.

FundReportsBehaves likeTop tenAs of
VNLA Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF 363 217.8 10.59% 2026-07-31
TOTR T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF 1,291 224 16.03% 2026-05-31
MINO PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 517 224.4 11.94% 2026-06-30
FSIG First Trust Limited Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF 314 224.9 9.94% 2026-07-31
DFSB Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF 740 228.5 13.29% 2026-07-31
EVSM Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF 382 234.7 10.35% 2026-06-30
FLMI Franklin Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF 1,336 238.2 14.33% 2026-06-30
UITB VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF 1,182 239.6 15.5% 2026-06-30
DUSB Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF 571 240.9 9.21% 2026-07-31
AVSF Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF 518 252.4 10.17% 2026-05-31

Essays that examine VRP

0

Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.