VIS holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

VIS's largest investment is Caterpillar Inc at 5.81% of net assets. General Electric and GE Vernova Inc follow; the three together are 14.37%. Ten companies are 30.57% of the fund; the other 372 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, VIS behaves like 62.7 holdings against a median of 42.4 — close to the median. Across 27 quarterly filings VIS has held roughly steady since 2019-11-30 (55.7 then, 62.7 now). Between the 2026-02-28 and 2026-05-31 filings 1 positions were added and 7 dropped; 6.6% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-11-30 and 2026-05-31, VIS went from behaving like 55.7 equally weighted positions to 62.7 — 13% more, while its top ten went from 34.59% to 30.57% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 382 positions in VIS's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: VIS.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of VIS's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.05 percentage points over 81 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: VIS.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-05-31, $7m was out to 8 borrowers, 0.09% of net assets. The largest, BARCLAYS BANK PLC, held 53.7% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 0.09% of net assets, 102.3% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter VIS has filed, with each borrower: VIS.json · all funds.

388 positions became 382: 1 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 7 dropped (0.2% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 6.6%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of VIS compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: Madison Air Solutions Corp (0.04%). Gone: Air Lease Corp (0.10%), CSG Systems International Inc (0.03%), Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp (0.02%), Sun Country Airlines Holdings Inc (0.01%), Freyr Battery Inc (0.01%), American Woodmark Corp (0.01%).

99.65% equity, 0.35% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $8.36B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Financing leg as filed: the fund pays OBFR01 + 0% on $32M of long swap notional . Issuers fill the spread field differently (some file the all-in rate), so compare within an issuer, not across.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of VIS (62.7). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.