TAGG holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 6.52% at a quoted market price (level 1), 23 issuer countries.

The largest line in TAGG's filing is not a stock but T. Rowe Price Government Reserve Fund, a short-term position at 3.86% of net assets. Ten companies are 20.44% of the fund; the other 1,807 share the rest. Among the 192 bond funds measured here, TAGG behaves like 125.9 holdings against a median of 236.4 — 1.9 times more concentrated than the median. Across 19 quarterly filings TAGG has become less concentrated: it behaved like 25.8 at 2021-10-31 and 138.8 at 2026-04-30. Between the 2026-01-31 and 2026-04-30 filings 109 positions were added and 59 dropped; 13.1% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable bond funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2021-10-31 and 2026-04-30, TAGG went from behaving like 25.8 equally weighted positions to 138.8 — 438% more, while its top ten went from 45.48% to 22.54% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 1,817 positions in TAGG's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: TAGG.csv.gz.

Share of TAGG's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of TAGG's own filings, 56 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.08 percentage points over 55 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: TAGG.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-07-31, $6m was out to 7 borrowers. The largest, BNP PARIBAS PRIME BROKERAGE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, held 24.7% of it.

The filing reports no cash collateral position against this loan. Collateral taken in a form the fund does not hold as a position does not appear in N-PORT, so this is silence rather than absence. What the collateral figure can and cannot show. Every quarter TAGG has filed, with each borrower: TAGG.json · all funds.

1,583 positions became 1,633: 109 added (12.7% of the fund at the later date), 59 dropped (3.5% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 13.1%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of TAGG compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: US TREASURY N/B (1.00%), GNMA II TBA MAY (0.51%), US TREASURY N/B (0.43%), US TREASURY N/B (0.39%), US TREASURY N/B (0.36%), US TREASURY N/B (0.35%). Gone: GNMA II TBA FEB (0.50%), FNMA 30 YR TBA FEB (0.41%), FNMA 30 YR TBA FEB (0.23%), US TREASURY N/B (0.21%), GNMA II TBA FEB (0.20%), GNMA II TBA FEB (0.19%).

6.5% of TAGG is carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's, from Form N-PORT; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $1.88B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured debt fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of TAGG (125.9). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.