RODM holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), 27 issuer countries.

RODM's largest investment is Equinor ASA at 1.18% of net assets. Nokia Oyj and Toronto-Dominion Bank/The follow; the three together are 3.35%. Ten companies are 11.15% of the fund; the other 327 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, RODM behaves like 190.7 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 4.5 times the median. Across 27 quarterly filings RODM has become more concentrated: it behaved like 300 at 2019-09-30 and 194.3 at 2026-04-30. Between the 2026-01-31 and 2026-04-30 filings 73 positions were added and 57 dropped; 26.3% of the weight moved. Japan is the largest country at 19.62% of the portfolio, across 27 countries in the filing.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-04-30, RODM went from behaving like 300 equally weighted positions to 194.3 — 35% fewer, while its top ten went from 7.25% to 10.39% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 337 positions in RODM's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: RODM.csv.gz.

Share of RODM's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of RODM's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.43 percentage points over 81 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: RODM.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-07-31, $41m was out to 11 borrowers. The largest, Jefferies LLC, held 30.1% of it.

The filing reports no cash collateral position against this loan. Collateral taken in a form the fund does not hold as a position does not appear in N-PORT, so this is silence rather than absence. What the collateral figure can and cannot show. Every quarter RODM has filed, with each borrower: RODM.json · all funds.

322 positions became 338: 73 added (13.8% of the fund at the later date), 57 dropped (11.5% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 26.3%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of RODM compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: ASML Holding NV (0.97%), Roche Holding AG (0.85%), AstraZeneca PLC (0.75%), ACS Actividades de Construccion y Servicios SA (0.67%), Ferrovial SE (0.50%), TFI International Inc (0.50%). Gone: Roche Holding AG (1.25%), Koninklijke KPN NV (0.76%), AstraZeneca PLC (0.72%), Japan Airlines Co Ltd (0.68%), ANA Holdings Inc (0.49%), Open Text Corp (0.49%).

100.0% of RODM is carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's, from Form N-PORT; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $1.48B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of RODM (190.7). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.