REM holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

REM's largest investment is Annaly Capital Management Inc COM at 22.77% of net assets. Agnc Investment Corp and Starwood Property Trust Inc follow; the three together are 45.11%. Ten companies are 73.26% of the fund; the other 23 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, REM behaves like 10.1 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 4.2 times more concentrated than the median. Across 28 quarterly filings REM has become more concentrated: it behaved like 14.2 at 2019-09-30 and 10.1 at 2026-06-30. Between the 2026-03-31 and 2026-06-30 filings 0 positions were added and 2 dropped; 4.0% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-09-30 and 2026-06-30, REM went from behaving like 14.2 equally weighted positions to 10.1 — 29% fewer, while its top ten went from 69.76% to 73.26% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 33 positions in REM's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: REM.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of REM's own filings, 84 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: REM.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-06-30, $1,750 was out to 1 borrower, 0.00% of net assets.

The filing reports no cash collateral position against this loan. Collateral taken in a form the fund does not hold as a position does not appear in N-PORT, so this is silence rather than absence. What the collateral figure can and cannot show. Every quarter REM has filed, with each borrower: REM.json · all funds.

34 positions became 32: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 2 dropped (0.3% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 4.0%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of REM compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

Gone: ACRES Commercial Realty Corp (0.26%), BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC. (0.02%).

99.96% equity, 0.04% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $548M. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Financing leg as filed: the fund pays OVERNIGHT BANK FUNDING RATE + 0% on $0M of long swap notional . Issuers fill the spread field differently (some file the all-in rate), so compare within an issuer, not across.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of REM (10.1). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.