MLPI holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), 2 issuer countries.

MLPI's largest investment is Williams Cos Inc/The at 9.49% of net assets. Enbridge Inc and TC Energy Corp follow; the three together are 26.44%. Ten companies are 61.94% of the fund; the other 16 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, MLPI behaves like 19 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 2.2 times more concentrated than the median. the United States is the largest country at 73.75% of the portfolio, across 2 countries in the filing.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

The 15 largest of 26 positions in MLPI's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: MLPI.csv.gz.

Share of MLPI's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of MLPI's own filings, 7 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: MLPI.json · all funds.

26 positions became 26: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 5.1%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of MLPI compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

98.62% equity, 1.38% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $676M. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of MLPI (19). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.