LIT holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 99.05% at a quoted market price (level 1), 9 issuer countries.

LIT's largest investment is RIO Tinto Plc-spon ADR Depositary Receipt at 19.48% of net assets. Samsung SDI Co Ltd and Albemarle Corp follow; the three together are 33.22%. Ten companies are 66.07% of the fund; the other 31 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, LIT behaves like 12.3 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 3.4 times more concentrated than the median. Across 27 quarterly filings LIT has held roughly steady since 2019-10-31 (13.3 then, 15.1 now). Between the 2026-01-31 and 2026-04-30 filings 1 positions were added and 0 dropped; 7.3% of the weight moved. the United States is the largest country at 37.76% of the portfolio, across 9 countries in the filing.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-10-31 and 2026-04-30, LIT went from behaving like 13.3 equally weighted positions to 15.1 — 14% more, while its top ten went from 75.82% to 60.15% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 41 positions in LIT's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: LIT.csv.gz.

Share of LIT's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of LIT's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

No compounded figure is shown. This site's two readings of LIT's monthly returns — the filed figures and a series computed from prices — differ by a median of 3.15 percentage points over 81 months, more than distributions explain. Which is wrong cannot be told from the filings; the others in the same position are listed here.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-07-31, $17m was out to 15 borrowers. The largest, BofA Securities, Inc., held 26.9% of it.

The filing reports no cash collateral position against this loan. Collateral taken in a form the fund does not hold as a position does not appear in N-PORT, so this is silence rather than absence. What the collateral figure can and cannot show. Every quarter LIT has filed, with each borrower: LIT.json · all funds.

40 positions became 41: 1 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 7.3%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of LIT compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: BANK OF NEW YORK (THE) (0.01%).

99.05% equity, 0.95% repurchase agreement as filed; 99.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of LIT (12.3). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.