JCPB holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 10.05% at a quoted market price (level 1), 50 issuer countries, 30.48% restricted securities.

The largest line in JCPB's filing is not a stock but JPMorgan U.S. Government Money Market Fund, Class IM, a short-term position at 10.24% of net assets. Ten companies are 21.19% of the fund; the other 2,667 share the rest. Among the 192 bond funds measured here, JCPB behaves like 81.3 holdings against a median of 236.4 — 2.9 times more concentrated than the median. Across 27 quarterly filings JCPB has held roughly steady since 2019-11-30 (66.6 then, 81.3 now). Between the 2026-02-28 and 2026-05-31 filings 218 positions were added and 139 dropped; 21.9% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable bond funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-11-30 and 2026-05-31, JCPB went from behaving like 66.6 equally weighted positions to 81.3 — 22% more, while its top ten went from 31.89% to 21.19% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 2,677 positions in JCPB's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: listed with the point-in-time files, available on request.

Share of JCPB's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of JCPB's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.06 percentage points over 81 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: JCPB.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2019-11-30, $10,611 was out to 1 borrower, 0.03% of net assets.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 0.05% of net assets, 174.4% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter JCPB has filed, with each borrower: JCPB.json · all funds.

2,581 positions became 2,660: 218 added (17.0% of the fund at the later date), 139 dropped (5.3% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 21.9%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of JCPB compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: FNMA/FHLMC (1.72%), FNMA/FHLMC (1.31%), FNMA/FHLMC (1.20%), Liberty 2026- Srt Frn (0.31%), Jonah LLC (0.27%), GNMA (0.27%). Gone: FNMA/FHLMC (1.01%), FNMA/FHLMC (0.47%), GNMA (0.29%), FNMA (0.20%), FNMA (0.20%), PRET LLC (0.17%).

10.1% of JCPB is carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1); 6.6% at level 3, priced from the filer's own inputs. Categories and levels are the filer's, from Form N-PORT; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $12.44B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured debt fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of JCPB (81.3). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.