IVOV holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

IVOV's largest investment is Alcoa Corp at 1.19% of net assets. Reliance Inc and TD Synnex Corp follow; the three together are 3.54%. Ten companies are 10.2% of the fund; the other 294 share the rest. Among the 721 equity funds measured here, IVOV behaves like 210.1 holdings against a median of 42.4 — 5.0 times the median. Across 27 quarterly filings IVOV has held roughly steady since 2019-11-30 (215.9 then, 210.1 now). Between the 2026-02-28 and 2026-05-31 filings 3 positions were added and 4 dropped; 6.9% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable equity funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-11-30 and 2026-05-31, IVOV went from behaving like 215.9 equally weighted positions to 210.1 — 3% fewer, while its top ten went from 9.77% to 10.2% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 15 largest of 304 positions in IVOV's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: IVOV.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of IVOV's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.08 percentage points over 81 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: IVOV.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-05-31, $573,473 was out to 4 borrowers, 0.04% of net assets. The largest, Scotia Capital (USA) Inc, held 58.3% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 0.04% of net assets, 99.5% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter IVOV has filed, with each borrower: IVOV.json · all funds.

305 positions became 304: 3 added (0.9% of the fund at the later date), 4 dropped (0.4% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 6.9%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of IVOV compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: SharkNinja Inc (0.51%), Solstice Advanced Materials Inc (0.37%), N/A (0.00%). Gone: Flowers Foods Inc (0.13%), Kemper Corp (0.11%), ASGN Inc (0.11%), ZoomInfo Technologies Inc (0.04%).

99.87% equity, 0.13% short-term investment as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $1.43B. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Financing leg as filed: the fund pays OBFR01 + 0% on $2M of long swap notional . Issuers fill the spread field differently (some file the all-in rate), so compare within an issuer, not across.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured equity fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of IVOV (210.1). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.