IBDR holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 23.34% at a quoted market price (level 1), 10 issuer countries.

The largest line in IBDR's filing is not a stock but BlackRock Cash Funds: Treasury, SL Agency Shares, a short-term position at 7.7% of net assets. Ten companies are 31.6% of the fund; the other 220 share the rest. Among the 192 bond funds measured here, IBDR behaves like 21.2 holdings against a median of 236.4 — 11.1 times more concentrated than the median. Across 27 quarterly filings IBDR has become more concentrated: it behaved like 239.7 at 2019-10-31 and 106 at 2026-04-30. Between the 2026-01-31 and 2026-04-30 filings 0 positions were added and 171 dropped; 30.7% of the weight moved. the United States is the largest country at 85.94% of the portfolio, across 10 countries in the filing.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable bond funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2019-10-31 and 2026-04-30, IBDR went from behaving like 239.7 equally weighted positions to 106 — 56% fewer, while its top ten went from 9.1% to 16.02% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

IBDR's filing lists 231 positions including 3.38% of net assets in securities-lending cash collateral. Counted as filed the fund reads 21.1 effective holdings with a top ten of 33.82%; on its own investments — the figure above — it reads 21.2 with a top ten of 31.6%. The collateral is matched by a liability and is not a holding the fund chose; since 2026-09-18 every figure on this site sets it aside (methodology). Both numbers are in the data.

The 15 largest of 230 positions in IBDR's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: IBDR.csv.gz.

Share of IBDR's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of IBDR's own filings, 81 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.07 percentage points over 81 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: IBDR.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-07-31, $111m was out to 12 borrowers. The largest, PERSHING, LLC, held 33.4% of it.

The filing reports no cash collateral position against this loan. Collateral taken in a form the fund does not hold as a position does not appear in N-PORT, so this is silence rather than absence. What the collateral figure can and cannot show. Every quarter IBDR has filed, with each borrower: IBDR.json · all funds.

545 positions became 374: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 171 dropped (30.6% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 30.7%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of IBDR compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

Gone: BOEING CO (0.91%), WELLS FARGO & COMPANY (0.71%), AT&T INC (0.63%), APPLE INC (0.59%), GILEAD SCIENCES INC (0.57%), ORACLE CORP (0.56%).

76.66% debt, 23.34% short-term investment as filed; 23.3% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured debt fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of IBDR (21.2). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.