ETHU holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 5.23% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

ETHU's largest investment is United States Treasury Bill at 353.35% of net assets. Between the 2026-02-28 and 2026-05-31 filings 1 positions were added and 4 dropped; 94.8% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable bond funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 2 largest of 2 positions in ETHU's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: ETHU.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of ETHU's own filings, 24 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: ETHU.json · all funds.

5 positions became 2: 1 added (94.8% of the fund at the later date), 4 dropped (93.3% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 94.8%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of ETHU compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: TREASURY BILL (94.77%). Gone: TREASURY BILL (43.57%), TREASURY BILL (31.30%), TREASURY BILL (10.58%), TREASURY BILL (7.89%).

94.77% debt, 5.23% short-term investment as filed; 5.2% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

A position count cannot describe a fund that uses derivatives, because a swap is filed at its unrealised gain, not its exposure. These are the notionals the fund itself reported, against net assets of $791M. Notional of an interest-rate or currency swap is not equity exposure.

Full detail for every fund that files derivatives: leverage.json (CC BY 4.0).

Every measured debt fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of ETHU (1.1). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.