DFAW holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 100% at a quoted market price (level 1), one issuer country.

The largest line in DFAW's filing is not a stock but Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF, a fund position at 52.59% of net assets. Ten companies are 100% of the fund; the other -5 share the rest. Among the 12 unknown funds measured here, DFAW behaves like 2.8 holdings against a median of 3.2 — close to the median. Across 11 quarterly filings DFAW has held roughly steady since 2023-10-31 (2.9 then, 2.8 now).

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable unknown funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2023-10-31 and 2026-04-30, DFAW went from behaving like 2.9 equally weighted positions to 2.8 — 3% fewer, while its top ten went from 100% to 100% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

The 5 largest of 5 positions in DFAW's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: DFAW.csv.gz.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of DFAW's own filings, 33 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference — percentage points over 0 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: DFAW.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-04-30, $5m was out to 1 borrower, 0.42% of net assets.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 0.43% of net assets, 102.8% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter DFAW has filed, with each borrower: DFAW.json · all funds.

5 positions became 5: 0 added (0.0% of the fund at the later date), 0 dropped (0.0% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 0.5%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of DFAW compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

100.00% unknown as filed; 100.0% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured unknown fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of DFAW (2.8). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.