BSCU holdings

Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing; what the measure does not tell you · every fund in one table · hold it with other funds? X-ray the mix. Pricing: 0.23% at a quoted market price (level 1), 8 issuer countries, 1.28% restricted securities.

BSCU's largest investment is Boeing Co. (the) at 1.22% of net assets. Meta Platforms Inc and Pacific Gas And Electric Co follow; the three together are 3.09%. Ten companies are 7.88% of the fund; the other 435 share the rest. Among the 192 bond funds measured here, BSCU behaves like 343.5 holdings against a median of 236.4 — close to the median. Across 23 quarterly filings BSCU has become less concentrated: it behaved like 61.4 at 2020-11-30 and 343.5 at 2026-05-31. Between the 2026-02-28 and 2026-05-31 filings 1 positions were added and 3 dropped; 0.8% of the weight moved.

Each sentence is read from the fund's own SEC filing; the class median is computed across the comparable bond funds on this site. Nothing here is a view on the fund.

Between 2020-11-30 and 2026-05-31, BSCU went from behaving like 61.4 equally weighted positions to 343.5 — 459% more, while its top ten went from 21.56% to 7.88% of net assets. Read across the funds on the concentration-over-time table.

One row per filed reporting period, newest first, read from EDGAR. Quarterly because that is the public filing cadence. Rows marked * are published but held out of the comparison above; the methodology page says when and why.

BSCU's filing lists 447 positions including 9.1% of net assets in securities-lending cash collateral. Counted as filed the fund reads 127.9 effective holdings with a top ten of 15.71%; on its own investments — the figure above — it reads 343.5 with a top ten of 7.88%. The collateral is matched by a liability and is not a holding the fund chose; since 2026-09-18 every figure on this site sets it aside (methodology). Both numbers are in the data.

The 15 largest of 445 positions in BSCU's Form N-PORT, weight as a share of net assets, securities-lending collateral excluded. Every position, every quarter: BSCU.csv.gz.

Share of BSCU's own investments by the issuer country the filer reported (incorporation, not revenue). Each country links to every fund that holds it.

Monthly total returns from Item B.5 of BSCU's own filings, 69 months on record. Not computed here and not from a price feed.

Cross-checked against a series computed separately from prices: median difference 0.12 percentage points over 68 months, which is roughly the distributions. Every month with the filing it came from: BSCU.json · all funds.

The fund lends its holdings, and Item B.4.a of the filing names every firm holding them. At 2026-05-31, $226m was out to 23 borrowers, 8.89% of net assets. The largest, JP MORGAN SECURITIES LLC, held 27.6% of it.

Cash collateral reported against the loan: 9.10% of net assets, 102.4% of the amount lent. That is a floor on the collateral, not the whole of it — collateral the fund does not hold as a position is not in this filing, so a figure under 100% is not evidence of under-collateralisation. How that figure behaves across all funds. Every quarter BSCU has filed, with each borrower: BSCU.json · all funds.

447 positions became 445: 1 added (0.1% of the fund at the later date), 3 dropped (0.6% at the earlier date). Half the sum of all weight changes, a turnover proxy: 0.8%. Positions are matched on identifiers, so a security whose identifier changed shows as one drop and one add. Every filing of BSCU compared this way, as a feed: changes.xml · all funds: filings received.

New: Lincoln National Corp. (0.12%). Gone: Honeywell International Inc. (0.27%), FS KKR Capital Corp. (0.18%), Starbucks Corp. (0.14%).

91.36% debt, 8.64% short-term investment as filed; 0.2% carried at a quoted market price (fair-value level 1). Categories and levels are the filer's; what a low level-1 share does and does not mean is in the measure's page.

Every measured debt fund lined up by how many holdings it behaves like; these sit either side of BSCU (343.5). Same filings, same arithmetic. Position in this list says nothing about which fund is better.